Literature DB >> 26327747

Current Status of Percutaneous Endografting.

Parag J Patel1, Quinton Kelly2, Robert A Hieb1, Cheong Jun Lee3.   

Abstract

Totally percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (PEVAR) using suture-mediated closure devices (SMCDs) has several well-established advantages over standard open femoral exposure as a direct consequence of being less invasive and having shorter times to hemostasis and procedure completion. The first multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of PEVAR and to compare percutaneous access with standard open femoral exposure was recently published (the PEVAR trial). The PEVAR trial demonstrated that percutaneous endografting is safe, effective, and noninferior to standard open femoral exposure among trained operators. The study reaffirmed the results of several recent single center and nonrandomized studies, demonstrating that percutaneous access facilitated shorter procedures, shorter times to secure hemostasis, and improved quality of life for patients. As PEVAR has gained popularity among patients and physicians, refinements to the technique and patient selection process have been made. There has been growing interest in treating patients with anatomical characteristics previously thought to be unsuitable for PEVAR, such as common femoral artery (CFA) calcifications, scarred groins, small CFA diameter, and high patient body mass index (BMI). However, observance of strict procedural technique and consideration for patient selection criteria remain paramount in achieving acceptable technical success rates with PEVAR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEVAR; ProGlide; interventional radiology; preclose

Year:  2015        PMID: 26327747      PMCID: PMC4540623          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  16 in total

1.  Closure of large percutaneous access sites using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery device.

Authors:  P C Haas; Z Krajcer; E B Diethrich
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1999-05

2.  The Kaiser Permanente experience with ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Jose M Sarmiento; Paul J Wisniewski; Natalie T Do; Jeff M Slezak; Majid Tayyarah; Paul K Aka; Trung D Vo; Jeffrey H Hsu
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  Current status of percutaneous endografting.

Authors:  Bulent Arslan; Ulku C Turba; Saher Sabri; J Fritz Angle; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  A H Malkawi; R J Hinchliffe; P J Holt; I M Loftus; M M Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  A meta-analysis of outcome after percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using different size sheaths or endograft delivery systems.

Authors:  George S Georgiadis; George A Antoniou; Miltos Papaioakim; Efstratios Georgakarakos; George Trellopoulos; Nikolaos Papanas; Miltos K Lazarides
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair success is predicted by access vessel diameter.

Authors:  Rodney P Bensley; Rob Hurks; Zhen Huang; Frank Pomposelli; Allen Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Elliot Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Access techniques for EVAR: percutaneous techniques and working with small arteries.

Authors:  David J Minion; Daniel L Davenport
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Selective use of percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair in women leads to fewer groin complications.

Authors:  Weesam K Al-Khatib; Mohamed A Zayed; E John Harris; Ronald L Dalman; Jason T Lee
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 1.466

9.  Percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective evaluation of safety, efficiency, and risk factors.

Authors:  Markus Eisenack; Thomas Umscheid; Joerg Tessarek; Giovanni F Torsello; Giovanni B Torsello
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Percutaneous suture-mediated closure versus surgical arteriotomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Vahid Etezadi; Barry T Katzen; Amer Naiem; Amardeep Johar; Scott Wong; Joseph Fuller; James F Benenati
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of percutaneous access and open femoral cutdown in elective endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Mustafa Akbulut; Adnan Ak; Özgür Arslan; Ömer Faruk Akardere; Ayşe Zehra Karakoç; Serkan Gume; Mesut Şişmanoğlu; Mehmet Altuğ Tuncer
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 0.332

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.