Literature DB >> 28316367

Is Friendship Network Weight Status Associated with One's Own Psychological Well-being? It Depends on One's Own Weight Status.

Paul T Fuglestad1, Melanie M Wall2, Jin Joo Shim3, Marla E Eisenberg4, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer5.   

Abstract

Drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives (e.g., social comparison theory, reward theory, evolutionary theory), the present research examined the relations of self and friendship network weight status to body satisfaction, self-esteem, and depression. A diverse, population-based sample of adolescents completed measures of well-being and were measured for height and weight. Boys had greater self-esteem if their male friendship networks' weight status mismatched, versus matched, their own weight status (d = .23). Conversely, boys had greater body satisfaction if their female friendship networks' weight status matched, versus mismatched, their own weight status (d = .18). For girls, the relations of male and female friendship networks' weight status with well-being did not vary by one's own weight status. Evolutionary theory appears to best explain the observed patter of results, and clinicians may want to consider friends' weight status when dealing with adolescents' body satisfaction issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; peer influence; psychological well-being

Year:  2016        PMID: 28316367      PMCID: PMC5353853          DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2016.35.5.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0736-7236


  28 in total

1.  Changes in terminology for childhood overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2010-06-25

2.  Peer influences on risk behavior: an analysis of the effects of a close friend.

Authors:  James Jaccard; Hart Blanton; Tonya Dodge
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2005-01

Review 3.  A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.

Authors:  Amanda J Rose; Karen D Rudolph
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The frequency, nature, and effects of naturally occurring appearance-focused social comparisons.

Authors:  Tricia M Leahey; Janis H Crowther; Kristin D Mickelson
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2007-01-16

5.  The harmful and beneficial impacts of weight bias on well-being: the moderating influence of weight status.

Authors:  Amanda Gumble; Robert Carels
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2011-08-26

Review 6.  Bias, discrimination, and obesity.

Authors:  R Puhl; K D Brownell
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-12

7.  Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape.

Authors:  Martin J Tovée; Peter J B Hancock; Sasan Mahmoodi; Ben R R Singleton; Piers L Cornelissen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society.

Authors:  Peter M Buston; Stephen T Emlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The weight of obesity in evaluating others: a mere proximity effect.

Authors:  Michelle R Hebl; Laura M Mannix
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-01

Review 10.  Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation's children.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Janet D Latner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.