Literature DB >> 12843403

Natural selection of more designable folds: a mechanism for thermophilic adaptation.

Jeremy L England1, Boris E Shakhnovich, Eugene I Shakhnovich.   

Abstract

An open question of great interest in biophysics is whether variations in structure cause protein folds to differ in the number of amino acid sequences that can fold to them stably, i.e., in their designability. Recently, we have shown that a novel quantitative measure of a fold's tertiary topology, called its contact trace, strongly correlates with the fold's designability. Here, we investigate the relationship between a fold's contact trace and its relative frequency of usage in mesophilic vs. thermophilic eubacteria. We observe that thermophilic organisms exhibit a bias toward using folds of higher contact trace when compared with mesophiles. We establish this difference both for the distributions of folds at the whole-proteome level and also through more focused structural comparisons of orthologous proteins. Our findings suggest that thermophilic adaptation in bacterial genomes occurs in part through natural selection of more designable folds, pointing to designability as a key component of protein fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12843403      PMCID: PMC166380          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1530713100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Two exposed amino acid residues confer thermostability on a cold shock protein.

Authors:  D Perl; U Mueller; U Heinemann; F X Schmid
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-05

2.  Comparative structural analysis of psychrophilic and meso- and thermophilic enzymes.

Authors:  Giulio Gianese; Francesco Bossa; Stefano Pascarella
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-05-01

3.  Elucidation of factors responsible for enhanced thermal stability of proteins: a structural genomics based study.

Authors:  Suvobrata Chakravarty; Raghavan Varadarajan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Why are some proteins structures so common?

Authors:  S Govindarajan; R A Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase.

Authors:  R V Banerjee; R G Matthews
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Investigation of the structural basis for thermostability of DNA-binding protein HU from Bacillus stearothermophilus.

Authors:  S Kawamura; Y Abe; T Ueda; K Masumoto; T Imoto; N Yamasaki; M Kimura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-08-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  SWISS-PROT: connecting biomolecular knowledge via a protein database.

Authors:  E Gasteiger; E Jung; A Bairoch
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.081

10.  How a protein binds B12: A 3.0 A X-ray structure of B12-binding domains of methionine synthase.

Authors:  C L Drennan; S Huang; J T Drummond; R G Matthews; M L Ludwig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  38 in total

1.  Multiple folding pathways of the SH3 domain.

Authors:  Jose M Borreguero; Feng Ding; Sergey V Buldyrev; H Eugene Stanley; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Imprint of evolution on protein structures.

Authors:  Guido Tiana; Boris E Shakhnovich; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein structure and evolutionary history determine sequence space topology.

Authors:  Boris E Shakhnovich; Eric Deeds; Charles Delisi; Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Protein sequence entropy is closely related to packing density and hydrophobicity.

Authors:  H Liao; W Yeh; D Chiang; R L Jernigan; B Lustig
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  Physics and evolution of thermophilic adaptation.

Authors:  Igor N Berezovsky; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Packing regularities in biological structures relate to their dynamics.

Authors:  Robert L Jernigan; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2007

8.  Shape-dependent designability studies of lattice proteins.

Authors:  Myron Peto; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.333

9.  Contact density affects protein evolutionary rate from bacteria to animals.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; D Allan Drummond; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Mining tertiary structural motifs for assessment of designability.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.