Literature DB >> 12842778

A study of urban housing demolitions as sources of lead in ambient dust: demolition practices and exterior dust fall.

Mark R Farfel1, Anna O Orlova, Peter S J Lees, Charles Rohde, Peter J Ashley, J Julian Chisolm.   

Abstract

Demolition of older housing for urban redevelopment purposes benefits communities by removing housing with lead paint and dust hazards and by creating spaces for lead paint-free housing and other community resources. This study was conducted to assess changes, if any, in ambient dust lead levels associated with demolition of blocks of older lead-containing row houses in Baltimore, Maryland (USA). In this article we present results based on dust-fall samples collected from fixed locations within 10 m of three demolition sites. In subsequent reports we will describe dust lead changes on streets, sidewalks, and residential floors within 100 m of the demolition sites. Geometric mean (GM) lead dust-fall rate increased by > 40-fold during demolition to 410 micro g Pb/m2/hr (2,700 micro g Pb/m2 per typical work day) and by > 6-fold during debris removal to 61 micro g Pb/m2/hr (440 micro g Pb/m2 per typical work day). Lead concentrations in dust fall also increased during demolition (GM, 2,600 mg/kg) and debris removal (GM, 1,500 mg/kg) compared with baseline (GM, 950 mg/kg). In the absence of dust-fall standards, the results were compared with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) dust-lead surface loading standard for interior residential floors (40 micro g/ft2, equivalent to 431 micro g/m2); daily lead dust fall during demolition exceeded the U.S. EPA floor standard by 6-fold on average and as much as 81-fold on an individual sample basis. Dust fall is of public health concern because it settles on surfaces and becomes a pathway of ambient lead exposure and a potential pathway of residential exposure via tracking and blowing of exterior dust. The findings highlight the need to minimize demolition lead deposition and to educate urban planners, contractors, health agencies, and the public about lead and other community concerns so that society can maximize the benefits of future demolition activities nationwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842778      PMCID: PMC1241579          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  3 in total

1.  The use of isotope ratios to apportion sources of lead in Jersey City, NJ, house dust wipe samples.

Authors:  J L Adgate; G G Rhoads; P J Lioy
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Exposure to lead from the Mystic River Bridge: the dilemma of deleading.

Authors:  P J Landrigan; E L Baker; J S Himmelstein; G F Stein; J P Weddig; W E Straub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing.

Authors:  David E Jacobs; Robert P Clickner; Joey Y Zhou; Susan M Viet; David A Marker; John W Rogers; Darryl C Zeldin; Pamela Broene; Warren Friedman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  A review of the distribution of particulate trace elements in urban terrestrial environments and its application to considerations of risk.

Authors:  S Charlesworth; E De Miguel; A Ordóñez
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Composition of heavy metals and airborne fibers in the indoor environment of a building during renovation.

Authors:  Mohd Talib Latif; Nor Hafizah Baharudin; Puvaneswary Velayutham; Normah Awang; Harimah Hamdan; Ruqyyah Mohamad; Mazlin B Mokhtar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Community experiences and perceptions related to demolition and gut rehabilitation of houses for urban redevelopment.

Authors:  Janice Bowie; Mark Farfel; Heather Moran
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Lead and other heavy metals in dust fall from single-family housing demolition.

Authors:  David E Jacobs; Salvatore Cali; Alison Welch; Bogdan Catalin; Sherry L Dixon; Anne Evens; Amy P Mucha; Nicole Vahl; Serap Erdal; John Bartlett
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Asbestos-containing materials in abandoned residential dwellings in Detroit.

Authors:  A Franzblau; A H Demond; S K Sayler; H D'Arcy; R L Neitzel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  A Community-Academic Partnership to Reduce Lead Exposure From an Elevated Roadway Demolition, Cincinnati, Ohio, 2012.

Authors:  Nicholas C Newman; Sarah Elam; Carol Igoe; Camille Jones; William Menrath; Denisha Porter; Erin N Haynes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Response of dust particle pollution and construction of a leaf dust deposition prediction model based on leaf reflection spectrum characteristics.

Authors:  Jiyou Zhu; Qiang Yu; Hua Zhu; Weijun He; Chengyang Xu; Juyang Liao; QiuYu Zhu; Kai Su
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Design and validation of a passive deposition sampler.

Authors:  Stephanie A Einstein; Chang-Ho Yu; Gediminas Mainelis; Lung Chi Chen; Clifford P Weisel; Paul J Lioy
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-07-23

9.  Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research: a survey at one urban academic institution.

Authors:  Clara Goldberg-Freeman; Nancy Kass; Andrea Gielen; Patricia Tracey; Barbara Bates-Hopkins; Mark Farfel
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Faculty perspectives on community-based research: "I see this still as a journey".

Authors:  Caitlin Kennedy; Amanda Vogel; Clara Goldberg-Freeman; Nancy Kass; Mark Farfel
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.