Literature DB >> 12842718

Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Valérie Delvaux1, Giovanna Alagona, Pascale Gérard, Victor De Pasqua, G Pennisi, Alain Maertens de Noordhout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to test prospectively corticospinal excitability changes and reorganization of first dorsal interosseous (FDI) motor cortical representation in 31 patients who experienced a first ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory. All had severe hand palsy at onset.
METHODS: Patients were assessed clinically with the Medical Research Council, Rankin, the National Institutes of Health stroke scales and Barthel Index at days 1, 8, 30, 90, 180 and 360 after stroke. The following parameters of FDI motor evoked potential (MEPS) to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation were measured at the same delays: motor threshold, MEP amplitude, excitable cortical area, hot spot and center of gravity of FDI motor maps on affected and unaffected hemispheres. Correlations were sought between clinical and electrophysiological parameters.
RESULTS: In patients whose affected motor cortex remained excitable at day 1, motor thresholds were not significantly different between sides and were similar to those of controls. Persistence of MEP on the affected side at day 1 was a strong predictor of good recovery. If present at day 1, MEPs recorded in affected FDI were significantly smaller than of the opposite side or in normals and progressively recovered up to day 360. In these patients, area of excitable cortex remained stable throughout the entire study. At day 1, amplitudes of MEPs obtained in unaffected FDI were significantly larger than later. Between days 1 and 360, we observed a significant displacement of center of gravity of motor maps towards more frontal regions on the affected side while no change was noted on the unaffected side.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the early prognosis value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. They indicate that the brain insult induces a transient hyperexcitability of the unaffected motor cortex. The evolution of FDI motor maps along the course of recovery mostly reflect corticospinal excitability changes but might also reveal some degree of brain plasticity. Most modifications observed occurred within 3 months of stroke onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842718     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00070-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  33 in total

1.  Differential Poststroke Motor Recovery in an Arm Versus Hand Muscle in the Absence of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Martin Lindquist; Jasim Uddin; Levke Steiner; Benjamin Hertler; Nathan Kim; Jessica Berard; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas Luft; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Adaptation to Leftward Shifting Prisms Alters Motor Interhemispheric Inhibition.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Selene Schintu; Alessandro Farnè; Laure Pisella; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke − a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jan Pawel Bembenek; Katarzyna Kurczych; Michal Karli Nski; Anna Czlonkowska
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Tobias Loetscher; Richard A L Macdonell; Amy Brodtmann
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  [Brain stimulation for treating stroke-related motor deficits].

Authors:  Caroline Tscherpel; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke.

Authors:  N S Ward
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients.

Authors:  Dinesh G Nair; Siobhan Hutchinson; Felipe Fregni; Michael Alexander; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Experience, cortical remapping, and recovery in brain disease.

Authors:  George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 10.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.