Literature DB >> 12838566

Factors affecting performance of prenatal genetic testing by Israeli Jewish women.

Carron Sher1, Orly Romano-Zelekha, Manfred S Green, Tamy Shohat.   

Abstract

The number of prenatal genetic tests that are being offered to women is constantly increasing. However, there is little national data as to who is performing the tests and the reasons for doing or not doing so. This study evaluated the proportion of Jewish women in Israel who perform the various prenatal genetic tests and the factors affecting the performance of these tests. It was found that 60.9% of the women performed the triple test, 50.8% of women older than 35 years performed amniocentesis, while 63.3 and 24.3% of women performed Tay-Sachs and fragile-X carrier testing respectively. Ninety-six percent of the secular women compared to only 6.7% of the ultrareligious women performed the triple test. It was also found that94.4% of the secular women, 36.4% of the religious, and none of the ultrareligious women older than 35 years performed amniocentesis. In the stepwise regression analysis, being secular, having a higher income, fewer children, and being of Ashkenazi origin remained significant factors in determining performance of Tay-Sachs carrier testing. As regards fragile-X carrier testing, being secular, having fewer than four children, and having a higher income and a supplementary medical insurance remained significant factors. The main reason reported by the women for not performing amniocentesis or the triple test was for religious or moral grounds (53.3 and 67% respectively). The main reason given for not performing Tay-Sachs or fragile-X testing was that they were not referred for the tests (76 and 82% respectively). Consideration should be given to providing first trimester prenatal diagnosis to the ultrareligious group, including state subsidized fragile-X testing and educating the primary care givers about the importance of prenatal genetic testing. The information from the present study is vital for the planning of an equitable prenatal genetic service and provides guidelines for the implementation of such services in other countries. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12838566     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  13 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Can population-based carrier screening be left to the community?

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Socializing the public: invoking Hannah Arendt's critique of modernity to evaluate reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Daniel Sperling
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-02

Review 5.  Genetic counseling services and training of genetic counselors in Israel: an overview.

Authors:  Michal Sagi; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Fragile X screening: attitudes of genetic health professionals.

Authors:  Kruti Acharya; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Expectant Israeli fathers and the medicalized pregnancy: ambivalent compliance and critical pragmatism.

Authors:  Tsipy Ivry; Elly Teman
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09

8.  Prenatal diagnostic services in three regional centers in Vietnam.

Authors:  Bui Thi Thu Ha; Nguyen Thi Thu Huong; Doan Thi Thuy Duong
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.