Literature DB >> 12831216

Maximum bite force, muscle efficiency and mechanical advantage in children with vertical growth patterns.

Patricia García-Morales1, Peter H Buschang, Gaylord S Throckmorton, Jeryl D English.   

Abstract

This study correlated maximum bite force and masticatory muscle electromyography (EMG) activity with craniofacial morphology and mechanical advantage of children with vertical growth patterns. From lateral cephalograms of 30 females and 17 males (9.3 +/- 3.6 years of age), 13 morphological and eight biomechanical measurements were recorded. Two maximum bite forces and 12 submaximal bite forces along with their associated EMG muscle activity were recorded at the right mandibular first molar. Muscle efficiency was evaluated using the relationship between bite forces and EMG activity levels. There were no significant sex differences (P > 0.05) for any of the morphological, functional or biomechanical variables. Factor analyses reduced: (1) the 13 morphological variables to four factors explaining 82.8 per cent of the morphological variance; (2) six functional variables to two factors explaining 68.8 per cent of the functional variance; and (3) 11 biomechanical variables to three factors explaining 90.9 per cent of the biomechanical variance. The vertical size factor was negatively correlated with the muscle efficiency factor (r = -0.39; P = 0.006) and positively correlated with the moment arm factor (r = 0.67; P < 0.001). The morphological divergence factor was negatively correlated with the bite force factor (r = -0.34; P = 0.019) and the mechanical advantage factor (r = -0.32; P = 0.028). The muscle efficiency factor (functional) was negatively correlated with the moment arm factor (r = -0.33; P = 0.023). It is concluded that: (1) independent of chronological age, children with larger faces have larger moment arms and require less muscle activity to attain any given force, and (2) greater hyperdivergence is related to poorer mechanical advantage and lower maximum bite force. These data support the relationships between bite force, muscle strength and morphology in children, similar to those reported for adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12831216     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

1.  Influence of anthropometry, TMD, and sex on molar bite force in adolescents with and without orthodontic needs.

Authors:  Barbara de Lima Lucas; Taís de Souza Barbosa; Paula Midori Castelo; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Ilknur Veli; Tancan Uysal; Asli Baysal; Irfan Karadede
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  The role of craniofacial maldevelopment in the modern OSA epidemic: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jason L Yu; Akshay Tangutur; Eric Thuler; Marianna Evans; Raj C Dedhia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  A three-dimensional method to calculate mechanical advantage in mandibular function : Intra- and interexaminer reliability study.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Ayala; Alfonso Sánchez-Ayala; Rafaela Cristina Kolodzejezyk; Vanessa Migliorini Urban; Manuel Óscar Lagravère; Nara Hellen Campanha
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  A theoretical analysis of longitudinal temporomandibular joint compressive stresses and mandibular growth.

Authors:  Riddhi J Desai; Laura R Iwasaki; Sohyon M Kim; Hongzeng Liu; Ying Liu; Jeffrey C Nickel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Nonsurgical treatment of a hyperdivergent skeletal Class III patient with mini-screw-assisted mandibular dentition distalization and flattening of the occlusal plane.

Authors:  Yiruo He; Yangyang Wang; Xinghai Wang; Jiangyue Wang; Ding Bai; Yongwen Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Maximum occlusal force and medial mandibular flexure in relation to vertical facial pattern: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rosemary S Shinkai; Fabio L Lazzari; Simone A Canabarro; Márcia Gomes; Márcio L Grossi; Luciana M Hirakata; Eduardo G Mota
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types.

Authors:  William Custodio; Simone Guimarães Farias Gomes; Fernanda Faot; Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues Garcia; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 9.  Anatomical, functional, physiological and behavioural aspects of the development of mastication in early childhood.

Authors:  Benjamin J D Le Révérend; Lisa R Edelson; Chrystel Loret
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.718

10.  First molar health status in different craniofacial relationships.

Authors:  Amal I Linjawi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.