Literature DB >> 34383033

A theoretical analysis of longitudinal temporomandibular joint compressive stresses and mandibular growth.

Riddhi J Desai, Laura R Iwasaki, Sohyon M Kim, Hongzeng Liu, Ying Liu, Jeffrey C Nickel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if temporomandibular joint (TMJ) compressive stresses during incisor biting (1) differed between growing children over time, and (2) were correlated with Frankfort Horizontal-mandibular plane angle (FHMPA, °) and ramus length (Condylion-Gonion (Co-Go), mm).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional anatomical geometries, FHMPA and Co-Go, were measured longitudinally from lateral and posteroanterior cephalographs1 of children aged 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 18 (T3) years. Geometries were used in numerical models to estimate subject-specific TMJ eminence shape and forces for incisor bite-forces of 3, 5, and 8 Newtons at T1, T2, and T3, respectively. TMJ compressive stresses were estimated via two steps: First, TMJ force divided by age-dependent mandibular condylar dimensions, and second, modified by loading surfaces' congruency. Analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference post-hoc tests, plus repeated measures and mixed effects model analyses were used to evaluate differences in variables between facial groups. Regression analyses tested for correlation between age-dependent compressive stresses, FHMPA, and Co-Go.
RESULTS: Sixty-five of 842 potential subjects had T1-T3 cephalographs and were grouped by FHMPA at T3. Dolichofacial (FHMPA ≥ 27°, n = 36) compared to meso-brachyfacial (FHMPA< 27°, n = 29) subjects had significantly larger FHMPA at T1-T3, shorter Co-Go at T2 and T3 (all P < .01), and larger increases in TMJ compressive stresses with age (P < .0001). Higher compressive stresses were correlated with larger FHMPA (all R2 ≥ 0.41) and shorter Co-Go (all R2 ≥ 0.49).
CONCLUSIONS: Estimated TMJ compressive stress increases from ages 6 to 18 years were significantly larger in dolichofacial compared to meso-brachyfacial subjects and correlated to FHMPA and Co-Go.
© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachyfacial; Compressive stress; Dolichofacial; Facial phenotype; Longitudinal growth; Temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34383033      PMCID: PMC8691471          DOI: 10.2319/012921-84.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  24 in total

1.  Human masticatory muscle forces during static biting.

Authors:  J C Nickel; L R Iwasaki; R D Walker; K R McLachlan; W D McCall
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Jaw mechanics in dolichofacial and brachyfacial phenotypes: A longitudinal cephalometric-based study.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; Y Liu; H Liu; J C Nickel
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Mechanobehaviour in dolichofacial and brachyfacial adolescents.

Authors:  J C Nickel; A L Weber; P Covington Riddle; Y Liu; H Liu; L R Iwasaki
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.

Authors:  L M Gallo; L R Iwasaki; Y M Gonzalez; H Liu; D B Marx; J C Nickel
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Size, shape and age-related changes of the mandibular condyle during childhood.

Authors:  Christoph A Karlo; Paul Stolzmann; Sandra Habernig; Lukas Müller; Traudel Saurenmann; Christian J Kellenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Correlation between maximum bite force and facial morphology in children.

Authors:  B Ingervall; C Minder
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Occurrence of malocclusion and need of orthodontic treatment in early mixed dentition.

Authors:  Katri Keski-Nisula; Raija Lehto; Vuokko Lusa; Leo Keski-Nisula; Juha Varrela
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Kevin O'Brien; Jean Wright; Frances Conboy; YeWeng Sanjie; Nicky Mandall; Stephen Chadwick; Ivan Connolly; Paul Cook; David Birnie; Mark Hammond; Nigel Harradine; David Lewis; Cathy McDade; Laura Mitchell; Alison Murray; Julian O'Neill; Mike Read; Stephen Robinson; Dai Roberts-Harry; Jonathan Sandler; Ian Shaw
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Orthodontic dental patients and expenditures--2004.

Authors:  Albert H Guay; L Jackson Brown; Thomas Wall
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Children's orthodontic utilization in the United States: Socioeconomic and surveillance considerations.

Authors:  Nadia Laniado; Stephanie Oliva; Gregory J Matthews
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.