Cynthia Geppert1, Philip Candilis2, Stephen Baker3, Charles Lidz2, Paul Appelbaum4, Kenneth Fletcher2. 1. New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System - Ethics 1501 San Pedro Dr. SE University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108. 2. University of Massachusetts Medical School. 3. University of Massachusetts. 4. Columbia University.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research on the motivations of research participants has focused primarily on vulnerable populations at risk of exploitation, and there is little research on the motivations and reasons of general medical patients participating in research. Given a significant increase in research studies recruiting participants with diabetes, we sought to better understand the motivations of patients with diabetes considering a general medical research protocol. METHODS: The analyses presented here compare the reasoning and willingness to participate in a hypothetical research study of medically ill subjects (patients with diabetes, n=51) with non-ill (n=57) subjects. Responses on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) were correlated with demographic variables and scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Short-Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: Overall, 44% of the group with diabetes and 56% of the comparison group indicated a willingness to participate in the research study. The reasons diabetic and comparison groups offered for willingness or unwillingness to participate in research did not differ significantly. 75% mentioned reasons related to treatment, 63% altruism; none mentioned money. Of those patients with diabetes who would not participate in research, 94% cited risk, and 89% expressed an aversion to research. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that when research is not related to their diagnosis, persons with diabetes do not differ significantly from non-ill comparison subjects in their motivations to participate in research. Given the similarity of our subjects' motivations to those of other medically ill populations, it may be that investigators can now focus more closely on the decision-making characteristics of their patients involved in clinical research rather than their diagnoses.
BACKGROUND: Research on the motivations of research participants has focused primarily on vulnerable populations at risk of exploitation, and there is little research on the motivations and reasons of general medical patients participating in research. Given a significant increase in research studies recruiting participants with diabetes, we sought to better understand the motivations of patients with diabetes considering a general medical research protocol. METHODS: The analyses presented here compare the reasoning and willingness to participate in a hypothetical research study of medically ill subjects (patients with diabetes, n=51) with non-ill (n=57) subjects. Responses on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) were correlated with demographic variables and scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Short-Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: Overall, 44% of the group with diabetes and 56% of the comparison group indicated a willingness to participate in the research study. The reasons diabetic and comparison groups offered for willingness or unwillingness to participate in research did not differ significantly. 75% mentioned reasons related to treatment, 63% altruism; none mentioned money. Of those patients with diabetes who would not participate in research, 94% cited risk, and 89% expressed an aversion to research. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that when research is not related to their diagnosis, persons with diabetes do not differ significantly from non-ill comparison subjects in their motivations to participate in research. Given the similarity of our subjects' motivations to those of other medically ill populations, it may be that investigators can now focus more closely on the decision-making characteristics of their patients involved in clinical research rather than their diagnoses.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bioethics; Diabetes; Empirical ethics; General medical research; Research participation; Research subject motivations
Authors: Philip J Candilis; Cynthia M A Geppert; Kenneth E Fletcher; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2005-10-27 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: William N Robiner; John A Yozwiak; Diane L Bearman; Trudy D Strand; Katherine R Strasburg Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Daniela L Buscariollo; Mario A Davidson; Margo Black; William E Russell; Russell L Rothman; Daniel J Moore Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zheng Kang Lum; Melanie Yee Lee Siaw; Michelle Jia Xin Lee; Zexuan Koh; Parry Quan Zhang; Soo Kiang Eng; Swee Chin Tan; Joyce Yu-Chia Lee Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Manas K Akmatov; Peggy Riese; Marcus May; Leonhard Jentsch; Malik W Ahmed; Damaris Werner; Anja Rösel; Megan Tyler; Kevin Pessler; Jana Prokein; Inga Bernemann; Norman Klopp; Blair Prochnow; Stephanie Trittel; Aravind Tallam; Thomas Illig; Christoph Schindler; Carlos A Guzmán; Frank Pessler Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marie Dahl; Susanne Friis Søndergaard; Axel Diederichsen; Frans Pouwer; Susanne S Pedersen; Jens Søndergaard; Jes Lindholt Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.295