Literature DB >> 12829133

The national practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1996-1999 Patterns of Care Study.

Mohan Suntharalingam1, Jennifer Moughan, Lawrence R Coia, Mark J Krasna, Lisa Kachnic, Daniel G Haller, Christopher G Willett, Madhu J John, Bruce D Minsky, Jean B Owen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted to evaluate the standards of practice for patients receiving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer from 1996 to 1999. This study examined the evaluation and treatment schemes used during this time and compared these results to the PCS data obtained between 1992 and 1994 to identify any fundamental changes in national practice.
METHODS: A national survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Specific information was collected on 414 patients with esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management at 59 institutions. Patients were staged according to the 1983 AJCC. Eligibility criteria for case review included RT between 1996 and 1999, no evidence of distant metastasis (including CT evidence of either supraclavicular or celiac nodes >1 cm), squamous cell or adenocarcinoma histology, Karnofsky performance status >60, tumors in the thoracic esophagus with <2 cm extension into the stomach, and no prior malignancies within the last 5 years. Statistical analysis was performed on the database using SUDAAN software to accurately reflect the type of sampling technique used by PCS. For the purpose of this analysis, institutions were stratified as either large or small based on the number of new cases seen each year. For the purposes of comparison, the 1992-1994 PCS esophageal survey results were subjected to the same statistical procedures and tests.
RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64 years. Seventy-seven percent were male, and 23% were female. Karnofsky performance status was >or=80% in 85% of patients. The racial profile mirrors the previous survey with 75% Caucasian, 21% African-American, 3% Asian, and <1% Hispanic. A review of the histology revealed a nearly 50:50 split between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Sixteen percent were clinical Stage I, 39% clinical Stage II, and 33% clinical Stage III according to the 1983 AJCC system. Workup included endoscopy (96%), CT of the chest (87%), CT of the abdomen (75%), and esophagram (64%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used in 18% of cases as compared to <2% in the original survey (p < 0.0001). Patients treated at large centers were more likely to undergo EUS than those treated at small centers (23% vs. 12%, p = 0.047). Fifty-six percent of patients received concurrent chemoradiation as definitive treatment. There was a significant increase in the use of concurrent chemoradiation before planned surgical resection as compared to the original survey (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.007). Other schemes included RT alone (10%), postoperative RT (1%), and postoperative chemoradiation (5%). Forty-six percent of patients with adenocarcinoma underwent trimodality therapy as compared to 19% with squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0002). Patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation were more likely to have had an EUS. The median total dose of external RT was 50.4 Gy, and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy. Brachytherapy was used in 6% of cases. The chemotherapy agents most commonly used included 5-fluorouracil (82%), cisplatin (67%), and paclitaxel (22%). Paclitaxel was more commonly employed as part of a preoperative chemoradiation regimen than in the setting of definitive chemoradiation (46% vs. 12%, p = 0.03). Compared to the original survey, paclitaxel use significantly increased between 1996 and 1999 (0.2% vs. 22%, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The Patterns of Care Survey confirms the use of concurrent chemoradiation as part of the national standards of practice for the management of esophageal cancer patients. A comparison with the previous study documents the significant rise in the use of EUS, preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, and the increasing use of paclitaxel as part of a combined modality regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12829133     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00256-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

Review 2.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Shifting practice in definitive chemoradiation for localized esophageal cancer.

Authors:  X M Qu; J J Biagi; W M Hopman; A Mahmud
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Nedaplatin concurrent with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ze-Tian Shen; Xin-Hu Wu; Bing Li; Jun-Shu Shen; Zhen Wang; Jing Li; Xi-Xu Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Current strategies in chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Lloyd; Bryan W Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

6.  The prognostic value of clinical and pathologic factors in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a mayo cohort of 796 patients with extended follow-up after surgical resection.

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Maliha Khan; Qian Shi; Stephen D Cassivi; Tsung-Teh Wu; J Fernando Quevedo; Patrick A Burch; Frank A Sinicrope; Robert B Diasio
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Panteleimon Kountourakis; Arlene M Correa; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; David C Rice; Ritsuko Komaki; Dipen M Maru; William A Ross; Ara Vaporciyan; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Treatment for unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer: current evidence and trends.

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Frank P Vleggaar; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Long-term outcome of a phase II study of docetaxel-based multimodality chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Nicholas W Choong; Ann M Mauer; Daniel C Haraf; Mark K Ferguson; Alan B Sandler; Kenneth A Kesler; Paul A S Fishkin; Rafat H Ansari; James Wade; Stuart A Krauss; David F Sciortino; Mitchell C Posner; Masha Kocherginsky; Philip C Hoffman; Livia Szeto; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Histological regression of squamous esophageal carcinoma assessed by percentage of residual viable cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an important prognostic factor.

Authors:  Daniel King Hung Tong; Simon Law; Dora Lai Wan Kwong; Kwok Wah Chan; Alfred King Yin Lam; Kam Ho Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.