Ze-Tian Shen1, Xin-Hu Wu1, Bing Li1, Jun-Shu Shen1, Zhen Wang1, Jing Li1, Xi-Xu Zhu1. 1. Ze-Tian Shen, Xin-Hu Wu, Bing Li, Jun-Shu Shen, Zhen Wang, Jing Li, Xi-Xu Zhu, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of nedaplatin (NDP) concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. METHODS:Sixty-eight patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were randomized into either a NDP group (n = 34) or a cisplatin (DDP) group (n = 34). The NDP group received NDP 80-100 mg/m² iv on day 1 + leucovorin (CF) 100 mg/m² iv on days 1-5 + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m² iv on days 1-5. The DDP group received DDP 30 mg/m² iv on days 1-3 + CF 100 mg/m² on days 1-5 + 5-FU 500 mg/m² iv on days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 4 wk in both groups. Concurrent radiotherapy [60-66 Gy/(30-33 f)/(6-7 wk)] was given during chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the short-term response rate between the NDP group and DDP group (90.9% vs 81.3%, P = 0.528). Although the 1- and 2-year survival rates were higher in the NDP group than in the DDP group (75.8% vs 68.8%, 57.6% vs 50.0%), the difference in the overall survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.540). The incidences of nausea, vomiting and nephrotoxicity were significantly lower in the NDP group than in the DDP group (17.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.031; 11.8% vs 47.1%, P = 0.016; 8.8% vs 38.2%, P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in the incidence of myelosuppression, radiation-induced esophagitis or radiation-induced pneumonia between the two groups. CONCLUSION:NDP-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. NDP-based regimen has comparable efficacy to DDP-based regimen but is associated with lower incidences of gastrointestinal and renal toxicity.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of nedaplatin (NDP) concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were randomized into either a NDP group (n = 34) or a cisplatin (DDP) group (n = 34). The NDP group received NDP 80-100 mg/m² iv on day 1 + leucovorin (CF) 100 mg/m² iv on days 1-5 + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m² iv on days 1-5. The DDP group received DDP 30 mg/m² iv on days 1-3 + CF 100 mg/m² on days 1-5 + 5-FU 500 mg/m² iv on days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 4 wk in both groups. Concurrent radiotherapy [60-66 Gy/(30-33 f)/(6-7 wk)] was given during chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the short-term response rate between the NDP group and DDP group (90.9% vs 81.3%, P = 0.528). Although the 1- and 2-year survival rates were higher in the NDP group than in the DDP group (75.8% vs 68.8%, 57.6% vs 50.0%), the difference in the overall survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.540). The incidences of nausea, vomiting and nephrotoxicity were significantly lower in the NDP group than in the DDP group (17.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.031; 11.8% vs 47.1%, P = 0.016; 8.8% vs 38.2%, P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in the incidence of myelosuppression, radiation-induced esophagitis or radiation-induced pneumonia between the two groups. CONCLUSION:NDP-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. NDP-based regimen has comparable efficacy to DDP-based regimen but is associated with lower incidences of gastrointestinal and renal toxicity.
Authors: Steven K Seung; John W Smith; John Molendyk; Stephen B Bader; Michael Phillips; James Regan; Jeannie Louie; Edward Soo; Mark Seligman; Janet Ruzich; Laurie Skokan; Helen J Ross Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Thomas Ruhstaller; Miklos Pless; Daniel Dietrich; Helmut Kranzbuehler; Roger von Moos; Peter Moosmann; Michael Montemurro; Paul M Schneider; Daniel Rauch; Oliver Gautschi; Walter Mingrone; Lucas Widmer; Roman Inauen; Peter Brauchli; Viviane Hess Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Herskovic; K Martz; M al-Sarraf; L Leichman; J Brindle; V Vaitkevicius; J Cooper; R Byhardt; L Davis; B Emami Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-06-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J S Cooper; M D Guo; A Herskovic; J S Macdonald; J A Martenson; M Al-Sarraf; R Byhardt; A H Russell; J J Beitler; S Spencer; S O Asbell; M V Graham; L L Leichman Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Y Heike; M Takahashi; T Ohira; H Arioka; Y Funayama; K Nishio; H Ogasawara; N Saijo Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 1995 Impact factor: 3.333