Literature DB >> 12827417

Hummingbirds pay a high cost for a warm drink.

C N Lotz1, C Martínez del Rio, S W Nicolson.   

Abstract

Endotherms must warm ingested food to body temperature. Food warming costs may be especially high for nectar-feeding birds, which can ingest prodigious volumes. We formulated a mathematical model to predict the cost of warming nectar as a function of nectar temperature and sugar concentration. This model predicts that the cost of warming nectar should: (1) decrease as a power function of nectar concentration, and (2) increase linearly with the difference between body temperature and nectar temperature. We tested our model on rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus). A typical experiment consisted of feeding birds nectar of a given concentration at 39 degrees C (equivalent to body temperature) and then at 4 degrees C, and vice versa. We used the percentage change in metabolic rate between the two food temperatures to estimate the cost of warming nectar. The model's predictions were accurately met. When birds had to hover rather than perch during feeding bouts, estimated food-warming costs were only slightly lower. The cost of warming nectar to body temperature appears to be an important yet overlooked aspect of the energy budgets of nectar-feeding birds. Hummingbirds feeding on 5% sucrose solutions at 4 degrees C have to increase their metabolic rate by an amount equivalent to that elicited by a 15 degrees C drop in ambient temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827417     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-003-0346-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  11 in total

1.  Does gut function limit hummingbird food intake?

Authors:  T J McWhorter; C Martínez del Rio
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.247

2.  Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs.

Authors:  Amy J Heyneman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The cost of a hot meal: facultative specific dynamic action may ensure temperature homeostasis in post-ingestive endotherms.

Authors:  R P Wilson; B M Culik
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1991

4.  On the temperature-dependency of optimal nectar concentrations for birds.

Authors:  W A Calder
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Respiratory exchange and ventilation during nocturnal torpor in hummingbirds.

Authors:  T L Bucher; M A Chappell
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

6.  Apparent absorption efficiencies of nectar sugars in the Cape sugarbird, with a comparison of methods.

Authors:  S Jackson; S W Nicolson; B E van Wyk
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

7.  Regulation of water and sodium balance in the field by Australian honeyeaters (Aves: Meliphagidae).

Authors:  D L Goldstein; S D Bradshaw
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

Review 8.  Pollination by passerine birds: why are the nectars so dilute?

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Food ingestion and water turnover in hummingbirds: how much dietary water is absorbed?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Heat increment of feeding in Brunnich's guillemot

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Specific dynamic action: a review of the postprandial metabolic response.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Changes in nectar concentration: how quickly do whitebellied sunbirds (Cinnyris talatala) adjust feeding patterns and food intake?

Authors:  A Köhler; L Verburgt; P A Fleming; S W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 3.  A review of the energetics of pollination biology.

Authors:  Kimberly P McCallum; Freya O McDougall; Roger S Seymour
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Added salt helps sunbirds and honeyeaters maintain energy balance on extremely dilute nectar diets.

Authors:  Cromwell Purchase; Patricia Fleming; Susan Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Honeybees prefer warmer nectar and less viscous nectar, regardless of sugar concentration.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson; Leo de Veer; Angela Köhler; Christian W W Pirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Regulation of nutrient intake in nectar-feeding birds: insights from the geometric framework.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; David Raubenheimer; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  The effect of cold-induced increased metabolic rate on the rate of 13C and 15N incorporation in house sparrows (Passer domesticus).

Authors:  S A Carleton; Carlos Martínez del Rio
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Ambient temperature influences Australian native stingless bee (Trigona carbonaria) preference for warm nectar.

Authors:  Melanie Norgate; Skye Boyd-Gerny; Vera Simonov; Marcello G P Rosa; Tim A Heard; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A nectar-feeding mammal avoids body fluid disturbances by varying renal function.

Authors:  Bradley Hartman Bakken; L Gerardo Herrera M; Robert M Carroll; Jorge Ayala-Berdón; Jorge E Schondube; Carlos Martínez Del Rio
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2008-10-22

10.  Seasonal intake responses in the nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina.

Authors:  Jorge Ayala-Berdon; Jorge E Schondube; Kathryn E Stoner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 2.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.