Literature DB >> 12827223

Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners' diagnostic performance.

Takashi Nakamoto1, Akira Taguchi, Masahiko Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu Suei, Minoru Fujita, Keiji Tanimoto, Mikio Tsuda, Mitsuhiro Sanada, Koso Ohama, Junichiro Takahashi, Madeleine Rohlin.   

Abstract

The detection of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) is an important strategy to reduce the incidence of osteoporotic fracture. Recent studies suggested that incidental findings on dental panoramic radiographs may be used as a tool to detect women with low BMD. However, little is known whether this finding is sufficiently assessed by untrained general dental practitioners (GDPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) the observer agreement and (2) the diagnostic efficacy in detecting women with low BMD, when untrained GDPs assess the appearance (normal or eroded) of the mandibular inferior cortex on dental panoramic radiographs of postmenopausal women. Twenty-seven GDPs were asked to classify the appearance of the mandibular inferior cortex on dental panoramic radiographs of 100 postmenopausal women who had completed BMD assessments of the lumbar spine and of the femoral neck. Intra-and inter-observer agreements were analyzed with kappa statistics. The diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) was analyzed by comparing two groups classified by the mandibular inferior cortex (women with normal and women with eroded mandibular inferior cortex) with those classified by BMD (women with normal BMD and women with osteopenia or osteoporosis). The mean sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 40%, respectively, when BMD of the lumbar spine was used as standard and 75% and 39%, respectively, when BMD of the femoral neck comprised the standard. Nineteen untrained GDPs (70%) presented a moderate to almost perfect intra-observer agreement. We conclude that dental panoramic radiograph may be used in clinical dental practice to identify postmenopausal women who have undetected low BMD and should undergo further testing with bone densitometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827223     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1419-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  16 in total

1.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision.

Authors:  H Orimo; Y Hayashi; M Fukunaga; T Sone; S Fujiwara; M Shiraki; K Kushida; S Miyamoto; S Soen; J Nishimura; Y Oh-Hashi; T Hosoi; I Gorai; H Tanaka; T Igai; H Kishimoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Identification of at-risk women for osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  L Weinstein; B Ullery
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Case-control study on self-reported osteoporotic fractures and mandibular cortical bone.

Authors:  A M Bollen; A Taguchi; P P Hujoel; L G Hollender
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-10

4.  Relationship between dental panoramic radiographic findings and biochemical markers of bone turnover.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Mitsuhiro Sanada; Elizabeth Krall; Takashi Nakamoto; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Yoshikazu Suei; Keiji Tanimoto; Ichiro Kodama; Mikio Tsuda; Koso Ohama
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible.

Authors:  A Taguchi; Y Suei; M Ohtsuka; K Otani; K Tanimoto; M Ohtaki
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; A N A Tosteson; C L Leibson; C S Crowson; G R Pond; C S Hammond; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group.

Authors:  E Klemetti; S Kolmakov; H Kröger
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1994-02

8.  Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.

Authors:  E Lydick; K Cook; J Turpin; M Melton; R Stine; C Byrnes
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Devlin; K Horner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Survival and potential years of life lost after hip fracture in men and age-matched women.

Authors:  A Trombetti; F Herrmann; P Hoffmeyer; M A Schurch; J P Bonjour; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  34 in total

1.  Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Mikio Tsuda; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Ichiro Kodama; Mitsuhiro Sanada; Takashi Nakamoto; Koji Inagaki; Toshihide Noguchi; Yoshiki Kudo; Yoshikazu Suei; Keiji Tanimoto; Anne-Marie Bollen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone mineral density and mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants.

Authors:  A Taguchi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Computer-aided system for measuring the mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs in identifying postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

Authors:  A Z Arifin; A Asano; A Taguchi; T Nakamoto; M Ohtsuka; M Tsuda; Y Kudo; K Tanimoto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Authors:  B Rud; J Hilden; L Hyldstrup; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Calciolari; N Donos; J C Park; A Petrie; N Mardas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Capability of CBCT to identify patients with low bone mineral density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eliete N S Guerra; Fabiana T Almeida; Fernanda V Bezerra; Paulo T D S Figueiredo; Maria A G Silva; Graziela De Luca Canto; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; André F Leite
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  The relationship between the calcaneal bone mineral density and the mental index in post-menopausal females.

Authors:  E Jagelaviciene; A Krasauskiene; R Zalinkevicius; R Kubilius; I Vaitkeviciene
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Development of a prediction tool for low bone mass based on clinical data and periapical radiography.

Authors:  R Licks; V Licks; F Ourique; H Radke Bittencourt; V Fontanella
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 9.  Clinical guidelines for the application of panoramic radiographs in screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Ray Tanaka; Naoya Kakimoto; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Yoshinori Arai; Takafumi Hayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi; Akitoshi Katsumata; Junichi Asaumi
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Improvement of region of interest extraction and scanning method of computer-aided diagnosis system for osteoporosis using panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Takashi Nakamoto; Akira Taguchi; Rinus Gerardus Verdonschot; Naoya Kakimoto
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.