Literature DB >> 12825638

When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm.

Michele Miozzo1, Alfonso Caramazza.   

Abstract

Pictures were shown with superimposed word distractors of high and low frequency. Low-frequency distractors produced greater interference on picture naming than did high-frequency distractors. This distractor frequency effect was not affected by manipulations that facilitated or hindered distractor recognition. Interference was reduced for distractors that were read aloud several times prior to being shown in the picture-naming task. Together these findings suggest that the distractor frequency effect has its locus at some stage of lexical access for production. Other findings further constrain hypotheses about which level of speech production is involved in the effect. The distractor frequency effect has implications for models of lexical processing in speaking as well as for accounts of picture-word interference and the frequency effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12825638     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  34 in total

1.  Naming and categorizing objects: task differences modulate the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.

Authors:  Ansgar Hantsch; Jörg D Jescheniak; Andreas Mädebach
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: evidence from picture-word interference tasks.

Authors:  Qingfang Zhang; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

3.  The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; R Job; F Peressotti; A Pascali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

4.  Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming.

Authors:  Greig de Zubicaray; Katie McMahon; Mathew Eastburn; Alan Pringle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.

Authors:  Niels Janssen; Walter Schirm; Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Rosa I Montoya; Cynthia Cera; Tiffany C Sandoval
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

8.  The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion.

Authors:  Elisah Dhooge; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

9.  The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-26

10.  A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.