Literature DB >> 19773045

Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3.

Nicolas Wentzensen1, Rosemary E Zuna, Mark E Sherman, Michael A Gold, Mark Schiffman, S Terence Dunn, Jose Jeronimo, Roy Zhang, Joan Walker, Sophia S Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We developed a protocol to collect representative cervical specimens based on colposcopic evaluation from women treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
METHODS: We analyzed the histology of biopsies targeting the worst and a normal area on the cervical surface in 74 women referred for LEEP because of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) detected in a previous biopsy. Lesions and normal tissue were identified in colposcopy, marked, and removed after LEEP. Cervical cytology specimens collected at the same time were analyzed using Pap cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping.
RESULTS: All but two women had an abnormal colposcopic impression with 59 of 68 (87%) showing an impression of CIN2 or greater. In 19 of 58 (33%) women, the histology result of the frozen specimen targeting the worst lesion was < or =CIN1. In 18 of 46 (40%) women, the histology of the frozen specimen targeting normal tissue was CIN2+. A concordant histology result in specimens targeting the worst lesion was associated with a greater extension of the CIN3 in the LEEP (p trend=0.002) and a HSIL cytology result (p trend=0.02).
CONCLUSION: It is challenging to sample representative cervical tissue. Even in women with confirmed CIN3, colposcopy performance to identify the worst lesion on the cervix was limited. Correctly identified CIN3s were more likely to be larger lesions that may have a higher risk of progression to cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19773045      PMCID: PMC2783867          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  16 in total

1.  Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse.

Authors:  Robert G Pretorius; Wen-Hua Zhang; Jerome L Belinson; Man-Ni Huang; Ling-Ying Wu; Xun Zhang; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Vivien W Hanson; Kim Abbey; Susan Dippery; Susi Gardner; Janet Kubota; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; Jose Jeronimo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images.

Authors:  Jose Jeronimo; L Stewart Massad; Philip E Castle; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision.

Authors:  L S Massad; C J Halperin; P Bitterman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. Design, methods and characteristics of trial participants.

Authors:  M Schiffman; M E Adrianza
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 6.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Jose Jeronimo; Ana C Rodriguez; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Findings to date from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.

Authors:  J Thomas Cox; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix.

Authors:  Silvano Costa; Maria De Nuzzo; Anna Rubino; Valeria Rambelli; Marica Marinelli; Donatella Santini; Paolo Cristiani; Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.

Authors:  Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Bhagwan M Nene; Surendra S Shastri; Kasturi Jayant; Richard Muwonge; Atul M Budukh; Sanjay Hingmire; Sylla G Malvi; Ranjit Thorat; Ashok Kothari; Roshan Chinoy; Rohini Kelkar; Shubhada Kane; Sangeetha Desai; Vijay R Keskar; Raghevendra Rajeshwarkar; Nandkumar Panse; Ketayun A Dinshaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Indications for p16/Ki-67 in cervical cytology].

Authors:  P Ziemke; H Griesser
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Accuracy of colposcopy in HIV seropositive and seronegative women with abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Teresa M Darragh; Howard Minkoff; Rodney Wright; Seble Kassaye; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; Charlesnika T Evans
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  [Self-collection of test material. Supplement to cervical cancer screening].

Authors:  B R Mangold
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Polarized Light Colposcopy Compared With Standard Colposcopy.

Authors:  Daron G Ferris; Wendy Shulay Guevara Condorhuaman; Jennifer L Waller; Lynn Allmond; Angela Goebel
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Increased detection of precancerous cervical lesions with adjunctive dynamic spectral imaging.

Authors:  Sara A DeNardis; Philip T Lavin; Jeff Livingston; William R Salter; Nanette James-Patrick; Emmanouil Papagiannakis; Christopher G Olson; Lori Weinberg
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-09-28

6.  The potential of RNA as a target for national screening of pre-cancer.

Authors:  Frank Karlsen; Margaret Muturi; Cosmas Muyabwa; Lars E Roseng; Serge Bigabwa; Byamungu Chihongola; Lucy Muchiri
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2018-12-21

7.  Combined dynamic spectral imaging and routine colposcopy strategy for the diagnosis of pre-cancerous cervical lesions.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Wanliang Hu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Can biopsies be omitted after normal colposcopy in women referred with low-grade cervical cytology? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Mindedahl Jespersen; Berit Bargum Booth; Lone Kjeld Petersen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.