Literature DB >> 12822595

Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.

Sander Nieuwenhuis1, Nick Yeung, Wery van den Wildenberg, K Richard Ridderinkhof.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging and computational modeling studies have led to the suggestion that response conflict monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex plays a key role in cognitive control. For example, response conflict is high when a response must be withheld (no-go) in contexts in which there is a prepotent tendency to make an overt (go) response. An event-related brain potential (ERP) component, the N2, is more pronounced on no-go than on go trials and was previously thought to reflect the need to inhibit the go response. However, the N2 may instead reflect the high degree of response conflict on no-go trials. If so, an N2 should also be apparent when subjects make a go response in conditions in which no-go events are more common. To test this hypothesis, we collected high-density ERP data from subjects performing a go/no-go task, in which the relative frequency of go versus no-go stimuli was varied. Consistent with our hypothesis, an N2 was apparent on both go and no-go trials and showed the properties expected of an ERP measure of conflict detection on correct trials: (1) It was enhanced for low-frequency stimuli, irrespective of whether these stimuli were associated with generating or suppressing a response, and (2) it was localized to the anterior cingulate cortex. This suggests that previous conceptions of the no-go N2 as indexing response inhibition may be in need of revision. Instead, the results are consistent with the view that the N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict arising from competition between the execution and the inhibition of a single response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822595     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  39 in total

1.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

2.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Errors are foreshadowed in brain potentials associated with action monitoring in cingulate cortex in humans.

Authors:  K Richard Ridderinkhof; Sander Nieuwenhuis; Theodore R Bashore
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task.

Authors:  E Jodo; Y Kayama
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06

5.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control.

Authors:  B Kopp; F Rist; U Mattler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  I Czigler; G Csibra; A Ambró
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-03-08       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.

Authors:  B Kopp; U Mattler; R Goertz; F Rist
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07

8.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  ERPs to response production and inhibition.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; J M Ford; B J Weller; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

10.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain.

Authors:  J C Woestenburg; M N Verbaten; J L Slangen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1983 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  321 in total

1.  Task difficulty modulates age-related differences in the behavioral and neural bases of language production.

Authors:  Haoyun Zhang; Anna Eppes; Michele T Diaz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition.

Authors:  Guido P H Band; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-13

4.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Modulation of the conflict monitoring intensity: the role of aversive reinforcement, cognitive demand, and trait-BIS.

Authors:  Anja Leue; Sebastian Lange; André Beauducel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Olaf Dimigen; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Brain dynamics underlying training-induced improvement in suppressing inappropriate action.

Authors:  Aurelie L Manuel; Jeremy Grivel; Fosco Bernasconi; Micah M Murray; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The acute effects of MDMA and ethanol administration on electrophysiological correlates of performance monitoring in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  D B Spronk; G J H Dumont; R J Verkes; E R A De Bruijn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ellen R A de Bruijn; Wouter Hulstijn; Robbert J Verkes; Gé S F Ruigt; Bernard G C Sabbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.