Literature DB >> 20805536

Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific.

Annekathrin Schacht1, Olaf Dimigen, Werner Sommer.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that cognitive conflicts require effortful processing and, therefore, are aversive (Botvinick, 2007). In the present study, we compared conflicts emerging from the inhibition of a predominant response tendency in a go/no-go task with those between incompatible response activations in a Simon task in a within-subjects design, using the same type of stimuli. Whereas no-go trials elicited reduced skin conductance and pupillometric responses, but prolonged corrugator muscle activity, as compared with go trials, incompatible and compatible Simon trials were indistinguishable with respect to these parameters. Furthermore, the conflict-sensitive N2 components of the event-related brain potential were similar in amplitude, but showed significantly different scalp distributions, indicating dissociable neural generator systems. The present findings suggest the involvement of different emotional and cognitive processes in both types of cognitive conflicts-none being aversive, however. In addition, the N2 findings call into question claims of common monitoring systems for all kinds of cognitive conflicts.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20805536     DOI: 10.3758/CABN.10.3.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  40 in total

1.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

2.  Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: a high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  P Praamstra; R Oostenveld
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

3.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold; Eric Soetens; Hannes Schröter; Werner Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task.

Authors:  Hartmut Leuthold; Hannes Schröter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  Guillermo Recio; Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control.

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Guido P H Band; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-09

8.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control.

Authors:  B Kopp; F Rist; U Mattler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research.

Authors:  A J Fridlund; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Errors are aversive: defensive motivation and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Dan Foti
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02
View more
  17 in total

1.  Modulation of the conflict monitoring intensity: the role of aversive reinforcement, cognitive demand, and trait-BIS.

Authors:  Anja Leue; Sebastian Lange; André Beauducel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Carlos Ventura-Bort; Alfons Hamm; Mathias Weymar
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder; Marco Steinhauser; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

Review 4.  The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Alexander J Shackman; Tim V Salomons; Heleen A Slagter; Andrew S Fox; Jameel J Winter; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Disarming smiles: irrelevant happy faces slow post-error responses.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Gedeon O Deák
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-07-21

6.  The role of affect and reward in the conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Roland Nigbur; Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-16

8.  Conflicts as aversive signals: conflict priming increases negative judgments for neutral stimuli.

Authors:  Julia Fritz; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  Pupil dilation in the Simon task as a marker of conflict processing.

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Guido P H Band
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  In Your Face: Risk of Punishment Enhances Cognitive Control and Error-Related Activity in the Corrugator Supercilii Muscle.

Authors:  Björn R Lindström; Isak Berglund Mattsson-Mårn; Armita Golkar; Andreas Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.