Literature DB >> 20414644

Fast muscle responses to an unexpected foot-in-hole scenario, evoked in the context of prior knowledge of the potential perturbation.

Masahiro Shinya1, Shinya Masahiro, Shingo Oda, Oda Shingo.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of prior knowledge of the potential loss of support during walking on muscle responses to the potential perturbation. Four conditions were tested; non-instructed control (NC), non-instructed perturbed (NP), instructed control (IC) and instructed perturbed (IP). Participants were perturbed by having them step into a hidden hole (8.5 cm) in a walkway during the NP and IP trials. Participants had no prior knowledge of the potential perturbation under the NC and NP conditions, but under the instructed conditions, participants were informed that there might be a hole in the walkway. A cautious landing strategy was observed in the IC trials. The participants exhibited flat-footed landings (plantar angle: NC: 13.7 +/- 2.8 degrees; IC: 8.5 +/- 5.2 degrees) and a prolonged double support phase (NC: 138 +/- 18 ms; IC: 161 +/- 17 ms) when they had prior knowledge of the possible hole. When the participants encountered a hole, we saw triggering of fast muscle responses in the ipsilateral plantarflexors and knee extensor, as well as in the contralateral dorsiflexors and knee flexors. This pattern was interpreted as a stop walking synergy. The opposite muscle activation pattern, which was thought of as a resume walking synergy, was induced when no hole was presented and actual foot contact occurred at the expected instant. The latencies between the onsets of muscle responses and the expected heel contact were shorter under the IP condition than under the NP condition (ipsilateral soleus: NP: 78 +/- 13 ms, IP: 64 +/- 14 ms; contralateral biceps femoris: NP: 94 +/- 25 ms; IP: 76 +/- 17 ms). Our results demonstrate that reactive muscle responses to perturbations depend on the anticipatory state with respect to potential perturbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20414644     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2248-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  The effect of visual targeting on ground reaction force and temporospatial parameters of gait.

Authors:  S C Wearing; S R Urry; J E Smeathers
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Role of the unperturbed limb and arms in the reactive recovery response to an unexpected slip during locomotion.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Allison J Bethune; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reflex responses in the lower leg following landing impact on an inverting and non-inverting platform.

Authors:  C Grüneberg; P H J A Nieuwenhuijzen; J Duysens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Feedforward adaptations are used to compensate for a potential loss of balance.

Authors:  Michael J Pavol; Yi-Chung Pai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hitting a support surface at unexpected height during walking induces loading transients.

Authors:  Marleen H van der Linden; Henk T Hendricks; Bastiaan R Bloem; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Control of dynamic stability during adaptation to gait termination on a slippery surface.

Authors:  Alison R Oates; James S Frank; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The neuromechanical tuning hypothesis.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka; Sergiy Yakovenko
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Analysis of rapid stopping during human walking.

Authors:  K Hase; R B Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Interaction of pre-programmed control and natural stretch reflexes in human landing movements.

Authors:  Martin J N McDonagh; Audrey Duncan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Perturbations of ground support alter posture and locomotion coupling during step initiation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mark W Rogers; Marjorie Johnson Hilliard; Katherine M Martinez; Yunhui Zhang; Tanya Simuni; Marie-Laure Mille
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Patterns of whole-body muscle activations following vertical perturbations during standing and walking.

Authors:  Desiderio Cano Porras; Jesse V Jacobs; Rivka Inzelberg; Yotam Bahat; Gabriel Zeilig; Meir Plotnik
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Common muscle synergies for balance and walking.

Authors:  Stacie A Chvatal; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Temporal, but not Directional, Prior Knowledge Shortens Muscle Reflex Latency in Response to Sudden Transition of Support Surface During Walking.

Authors:  Masahiro Shinya; Noritaka Kawashima; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.