Literature DB >> 12812277

Word identification and eye fixation locations in visual and visual-plus-auditory presentations of spoken sentences.

Charissa R Lansing1, George W McConkie.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated where people look on talkers' faces as they try to understand what is being said. Sixteen young adults with normal hearing and demonstrated average speechreading proficiency were evaluated under two modality presentation conditions: vision only versus vision plus low-intensity sound. They were scored for the number of words correctly identified from 80 unconnected sentences spoken by two talkers. The results showed two competing tendencies: an eye primacy effect that draws the gaze to the talkers eyes during silence and an information source attraction effect that draws the gaze to the talker's mouth during speech periods. Dynamic shifts occur between eyes and mouth prior to speech onset and following the offset of speech, and saccades tend to be suppressed during speech periods. The degree to which the gaze is drawn to the mouth during speech and the degree to which saccadic activity is suppressed depend on the difficulty of the speech identification task. Under the most difficult modality presentation condition, vison only, accuracy was related to average sentence difficulty and individual proficiency in visual speech perception, but not to the proportion of gaze time directed toward the talkers mouth or toward other parts of the talker's face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12812277     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  29 in total

1.  Infants deploy selective attention to the mouth of a talking face when learning speech.

Authors:  David J Lewkowicz; Amy M Hansen-Tift
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Dynamic faces speed up the onset of auditory cortical spiking responses during vocal detection.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Luis Lemus; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The redeployment of attention to the mouth of a talking face during the second year of life.

Authors:  Anne Hillairet de Boisferon; Amy H Tift; Nicholas J Minar; David J Lewkowicz
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.

Authors:  Demet Gurler; Nathan Doyle; Edgar Walker; John Magnotti; Michael Beauchamp
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Multisensory speech perception in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Tiffany G Woynaroski; Leslie D Kwakye; Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Ryan A Stevenson; Wendy L Stone; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-12

7.  Spatial Frequency Requirements and Gaze Strategy in Visual-Only and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Amanda H Wilson; Agnès Alsius; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  "Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.

Authors:  Ruth B Grossman; Erin Steinhart; Teresa Mitchell; William McIlvane
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.216

9.  Bilingualism modulates infants' selective attention to the mouth of a talking face.

Authors:  Ferran Pons; Laura Bosch; David J Lewkowicz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03-12

10.  The natural statistics of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Andrea Trubanova; Sébastien Stillittano; Alice Caplier; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.