Literature DB >> 12809894

Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate.

Alexandre de la Taille1, Patrick Antiphon, Laurent Salomon, Maguy Cherfan, Raphael Porcher, Andras Hoznek, Fabien Saint, Dimitri Vordos, Anthony Cicco, René Yiou, Elie Serge Zafrani, Dominique Chopin, Claude Clément Abbou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the diagnostic yield of a 21-sample ultrasound-guided needle biopsy procedure for prostate cancer in patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
METHODS: Between December 2000 and May 2002, 303 patients underwent 21-sample needle biopsy under local anesthesia, comprising sextant biopsies at a 45 degrees angle, 3 biopsies in each peripheral zone at an 80 degrees angle, 3 biopsies in each transition zone (TZ), and 3 biopsies in the midline peripheral zone. Morbidity was assessed clinically. A short questionnaire was filled out by 90 consecutive patients.
RESULTS: The cancer detection rate using 6 biopsy samples (sextant biopsies only), 12 samples (sextant plus lateral biopsies), 18 samples (sextant plus lateral plus TZ biopsies), and 21 samples (sextant plus lateral plus TZ, plus midline biopsies) was 22.7%, 28.3%, 30.7%, and 31.3%, respectively. The 21-sample procedure statistically improved the cancer detection rate by 37.9% relative to the 6-sample procedure. The improvement was most marked in patients with a prostate volume of more than 40 cm(3) (48.3%), patients with Stage T1c prostate disease (44.9%), patients undergoing repeat biopsy (66.2%), and patients with prostate-specific antigen levels greater than 10 ng/mL (38.5%). Adverse effects were infrequent (3%), consisting of prostatitis in 3 patients, acute urinary retention in 6 patients, and rectal bleeding requiring hospitalization in 1 patient taking aspirin. Using the questionnaire, 84% of patients reported macroscopic hematuria for an average of 3.4 days and hematospermia for 12.8 days, and 45% reported minor rectal bleeding lasting 1.1 days. The mean pain score, with a visual analog scale ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (intense pain), was 4.56.
CONCLUSIONS: A 21-sample needle biopsy procedure increased the prostate cancer detection rate relative to a 6-sample procedure, without increasing morbidity. Patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen values should undergo sextant biopsies and at least 6 additional biopsies in the peripheral zone and 6 in the TZ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12809894     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00108-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  35 in total

Review 1.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

2.  Time of administration of a single dose of oral levofloxacin and its effect in infectious complications from transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Athanasios N Argyropoulos; Konstantinos Doumas; Antonios Farmakis; Ioannis Liakatas; Ioannis Gkialas; Michael Lykourinas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

4.  Does the prostate volume always effect cancer detection rate in prostate biopsy? Additional role of prostate-specific antigen levels: A retrospective analysis of 2079 patients.

Authors:  Engin Kandıralı; Mustafa Zafer Temiz; Aykut Çolakerol; Emrah Yürük; Atilla Semerciöz; Ahmet Yaser Müslümanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 5.  Standards for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  The 20-core prostate biopsy as an initial strategy: impact on the detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Amine Jradi; Mohamed Dridi; Mourad Teyeb; Mokhtar Ould Sidi Mohamed; Ramzi Khiary; Samir Ghozzi; Nawfel Ben Rais
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Management of rising prostate-specific antigen after a negative biopsy.

Authors:  David A Levy; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Spatial Tracking of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Locations: Moving Towards Effective Focal Partial Prostate Gland Ablation with Improved Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Steven Sidelsky; Shaan Setia; Srinivas Vourganti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Contemporary pathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of prostate cancers missed by 6- and 12-core biopsy and diagnosed with a 21-core biopsy protocol.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Evanguelos Xylinas; Alexandre Campeggi; Andras Hoznek; Dimitri Vordos; Claude-Clément Abbou; Francis Vacherot; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; H Ballentine Carter; Paul Schellhammer; Michael S Cookson; Leonard G Gomella; Dean Troyer; Thomas M Wheeler; Steven Schlossberg; David F Penson; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.