Literature DB >> 12805314

The receptive-field organization of simple cells in primary visual cortex of ferrets under natural scene stimulation.

Darragh Smyth1, Ben Willmore, Gary E Baker, Ian D Thompson, David J Tolhurst.   

Abstract

The responses of simple cells in primary visual cortex to sinusoidal gratings can primarily be predicted from their spatial receptive fields, as mapped using spots or bars. Although this quasilinearity is well documented, it is not clear whether it holds for complex natural stimuli. We recorded from simple cells in the primary visual cortex of anesthetized ferrets while stimulating with flashed digitized photographs of natural scenes. We applied standard reverse-correlation methods to quantify the average natural stimulus that invokes a neuronal response. Although these maps cannot be the receptive fields, we find that they still predict the preferred orientation of grating for each cell very well (r = 0.91); they do not predict the spatial-frequency tuning. Using a novel application of the linear reconstruction method called regularized pseudoinverse, we were able to recover high-resolution receptive-field maps from the responses to a relatively small number of natural scenes. These receptive-field maps not only predict the optimum orientation of each cell (r = 0.96) but also the spatial-frequency optimum (r = 0.89); the maps also predict the tuning bandwidths of many cells. Therefore, our first conclusion is that the tuning preferences of the cells are primarily linear and constant across stimulus type. However, when we used these maps to predict the actual responses of the cells to natural scenes, we did find evidence of expansive output nonlinearity and nonlinear influences from outside the classical receptive fields, orientation tuning, and spatial-frequency tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12805314      PMCID: PMC6740783     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Linearity of cortical receptive fields measured with natural sounds.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Michael S Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Automating the design of informative sequences of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewi; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Spatial structure of neuronal receptive field in awake monkey secondary visual cortex (V2).

Authors:  Lu Liu; Liang She; Ming Chen; Tianyi Liu; Haidong D Lu; Yang Dan; Mu-ming Poo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Analyzing receptive fields, classification images and functional images: challenges with opportunities for synergy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Responses of V1 neurons to two-dimensional hermite functions.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Ferenc Mechler; Michael A Repucci; Keith P Purpura; Tatyana Sharpee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Hiroki Sugihara; Andrei V Kurgansky; Sergei P Rebrik; Michael P Stryker; Kenneth D Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  On the importance of static nonlinearity in estimating spatiotemporal neural filters with natural stimuli.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Kenneth D Miller; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Frequency-band signatures of visual responses to naturalistic input in ferret primary visual cortex during free viewing.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Davis V Bennett; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.