Literature DB >> 12802664

PicSOr: an objective test of perceptual skill that predicts laparoscopic technical skill in three initial studies of laparoscopic performance.

A G Gallagher1, R Cowie, I Crothers, J-A Jordan-Black, R M Satava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery requires surgeons to infer the shape of 3-D structures, such as the internal organs of patients, from 2-D displays on a video monitor. Recent evidence indicates that the issue is not resolved by the use of contemporary 3-D camera systems. It is therefore crucial to find ways of measuring differences in aptitude for recovering 3-D structure from 2-D images, and assessing its impact on performance. Our aim was to test empirically for a relationship between laparoscopic ability and the perceptual skill of recovering information about 3-D structures from 2-D monitor displays.
METHODS: Participants in three studies completed a simulated laparoscopic cutting task as well as the Pictorial Surface Orientation (PicSOr)3 Test. In studies 1 (n = 48) and 2 (n = 32) both groups were laparoscopic novices, and in study 3 (n = 34) 18 of the participants were experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
FINDINGS: All three studies showed that PicSOr consistently predicted the laparoscopic performance of participants on the laparoscopic cutting task (study 1, r = 0.5, p < 0.0003; study 2, r = 0.5, p < 0.004; and study 3, r = 0.42, p = 0.017). Furthermore, it was also a significant predictor of laparoscopic surgeons' performance (r = 0.54, p = 0.047). INTERPRETATIONS: This is the first objective perceptual psychometric test to reliably predict laparoscopic technical skills. PicSOr provides a tool for assessing which trainees have the potential to learn minimal access surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802664     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8569-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Measurement and modelling of perceived slant in surfaces represented by freely viewed line drawings.

Authors:  R Cowie
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Smith; N Taffinder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

3.  Cholecystectomy practice transformed.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy.

Authors:  D H Birkett
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1995-10

5.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials.

Authors:  R J Miller
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Ergonomics in the operating room.

Authors:  R Berguer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration.

Authors:  I R Crothers; A G Gallagher; N McClure; D T James; J McGuigan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of Defense.

Authors:  D C Wherry; C G Rob; M R Marohn; N M Rich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  21 in total

1.  Performance on a virtual reality angled laparoscope task correlates with spatial ability of trainees.

Authors:  Rachel Rosenthal; Christian Hamel; Daniel Oertli; Nicolas Demartines; Walter A Gantert
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; H McCarthy; J I Lew; A Egan; P Christos; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Visuospatial abilities correlate with performance of senior endoscopy specialist in simulated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bo Westman; E Matt Ritter; Ann Kjellin; Leif Törkvist; Torsten Wredmark; Li Felländer-Tsai; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training.

Authors:  Florian M Franzeck; Rachel Rosenthal; Markus K Muller; Antonio Nocito; Frauke Wittich; Christine Maurus; Daniel Dindo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Predictive value of background experiences and visual spatial ability testing on laparoscopic baseline performance among residents entering postgraduate surgical training.

Authors:  Marisa Louridas; Lauren E Quinn; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Distribution of innate ability for surgery amongst medical students assessed by an advanced virtual reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Luca Morelli; Franca Melfi; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Visual spatial ability for surgical trainees: implications for learning endoscopic, laparoscopic surgery and other image-guided procedures.

Authors:  Patrick Henn; Anthony G Gallagher; Emmeline Nugent; Neal E Seymour; Randy S Haluck; Hazem Hseino; Oscar Traynor; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Sex is not everything: the role of gender in early performance of a fundamental laparoscopic skill.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Amin Andalib; Pepa Kaneva; Jiguo Cao; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Effects of a retention interval and refresher session on intracorporeal suturing and knot tying skill and mental workload.

Authors:  Mark W Scerbo; Rebecca C Britt; Michael Montano; Rebecca A Kennedy; Erik Prytz; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.