Literature DB >> 12802642

Long-term outcome and health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open colectomy for benign disease.

K Thaler1, A Dinnewitzer, E Mascha, S Arrigain, E G Weiss, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) vs open colectomy (OC) for the treatment of benign disease have not yet been clearly demonstrated with regard to long-term consequences and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this study was to compare LC and OC in terms of outcome and HRQL and to determine whether a generic nonspecific instrument for HRQL assessment is valid in postoperative follow-up.
METHODS: Forty-nine patients who underwent LC for elective right hemicolectomy (RH) or sigmoid resection (SR) for benign polyps or uncomplicated diverticular disease between 1992 and 2000 were evaluated and compared to 50 controls treated by OC in the same period. All patients were evaluated by postal questionnaire to determine recurrence rates and surgery-related complications. HRQL was assessed by the SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Score (PCS, MCS) and by the SF-36 Health Survey, which measures eight different health-quality domains, including physical and social functioning (PF, SF), general health perception (GH), physical and emotional role limitations (RP, RE), body pain (BP), vitality (VT), and mental health (MH).
RESULTS: The LC and OC patients were similar in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and diagnosis. There were significant differences between the two groups in resection type (26 RH:23 SR in LC vs 16 RH:34 SR in OC, p = 0.03) and length of follow-up (median, 39 and 53.5 months, respectively, p = 0.04), but neither parameter was predictive of the main SF-36 scores (PCS and MCS). There were no differences between the groups in recurrence rates (8% in LC vs 11% in OC) or surgery-related complications, including incisional hernias (16.3% in LC vs 17% in OC) and small bowel obstructions (2% in LC vs 10.4% in OC). None of the eight SF-36 Health Survey domains or the PCS or MCS scores showed significant differences between LC and OC patients in HRQL. However, occurrence of hernia after surgery was predictive of lower SF-36 scores, specifically in PF (p = 0.047), GH (p = 0.045), SF (p = 0.047), MH (p = 0.041), and MCS (p = 0.037). In addition, small bowel obstruction was significantly associated with lower scores in BP (p = 0.008), GH (p = 0.008), SF (p = 0.013), RE (p = 0.026), MH (p = 0.003), and MCS (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: LC was not different from OC for selected indications that measure long-term outcome and HRQL. SF-36 appears to be an appropriate instrument to measure postoperative HRQL, showing responsiveness to changes in objective outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802642     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8855-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services.

Authors:  J E Ware; W G Manning; N Duan; K B Wells; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1984-10

4.  Health status of survivors of cardiac arrest and of myocardial infarction controls.

Authors:  L Bergner; A P Hallstrom; M Bergner; M S Eisenberg; L A Cobb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  C Y Ko; L C Rusin; D J Schoetz; L Moreau; J A Coller; J J Murray; P L Roberts; T D Arnell
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  C A Maxwell-Armstrong; M H Robinson; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pros and cons.

Authors:  T C Sardinha; S D Wexner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Quality of life after treatment for pancreatitis.

Authors:  A H Broome; G M Eisen; R C Harland; B H Collins; W C Meyers; T N Pappas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R H Brook; J E Ware; W H Rogers; E B Keeler; A R Davies; C A Donald; G A Goldberg; K N Lohr; P C Masthay; J P Newhouse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial.

Authors:  Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Muhammed S Sajid; Kamran Khatri; Elizabeth Cheek; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

3.  Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Shigeru Yamagishi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Jun Watanabe; Hirokazu Suwa; Takashi Oshima; Chikara Kunisaki; Shigeo Ohki; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefan Maartense; Michalda S Dunker; J Frederick Slors; Miguel A Cuesta; Dirk J Gouma; Sander J van Deventer; Ad A van Bodegraven; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Laparoscopy and collagen metabolism.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; M Binnebösel; P Bertram; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Gas-related impact of pneumoperitoneum on systemic wound healing.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; M Binnebösel; N Mirgartz; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefan Maartense; Mich S Dunker; J Frederik M Slors; Miguel A Cuesta; Erik G J M Pierik; Dirk J Gouma; Daan W Hommes; Miriam A Sprangers; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  B Person; S M Cera; D R Sands; E G Weiss; A M Vernava; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Long term outcome and quality of life after open incisional hernia repair--light versus heavy weight meshes.

Authors:  Roland Ladurner; Costanza Chiapponi; Quirin Linhuber; Thomas Mussack
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Avoiding or reversing Hartmann's procedure provides improved quality of life after perforated diverticulitis.

Authors:  Jefrey Vermeulen; Martijn P Gosselink; Jan J V Busschbach; Johan F Lange
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.