Literature DB >> 1279736

Molecular determinants of channel function.

O S Andersen1, R E Koeppe.   

Abstract

The 40 years since the seminal papers of Hodgkin and Huxley appeared have been extraordinarily productive in terms of understanding the molecular basis for electrical activity. The Hodgkin-Huxley proposal that electrical excitability should be understood in terms of voltage-dependent changes in discrete sites has been resoundingly verified. Indeed, the Hodgkin-Huxley framework is remarkable in that its essential elements have remained largely intact as molecular understanding has advanced. This robustness is, at least in part, a result of the fact that Hodgkin and Huxley developed a mathematical model, based on simple physical arguments, that was sufficiently comprehensive to describe the kinetics of the voltage-clamped currents and yet simple enough to be predictive. The predictive features were demonstrated early by the reconstruction of both space-clamped and propagated action potentials on a desk-top calculator (293) and, later, when the sites of Hodgkin and Huxley developed into being well-characterized molecular structures. Voltage- and ligand-dependent ion-selective channels are now the established framework within which cellular electrophysiology is being pursued. Moreover, electrophysiological measurements of membrane and single-channel currents have become essential tools to examine molecular questions pertaining to channel structure and activity. The last 10 years have witnessed spectacular activity, which has resulted from two developments, the giga-seal patch clamp (249) and the elucidation of primary sequences of a number of channel-forming proteins (494), along with the first outlines of their low-resolution three-dimensional structures (651). The stage is now set for 1) applying a variety of convergent techniques to decipher molecular structural details at high resolution, and 2) seeking to understand the complex dynamic functions, gating, and ion selectivity at the molecular level. The early successes are likely to be in understanding the molecular determinants of ion conductance and selectivity, initially in terms of quantitative descriptions of how a sequence modification can alter a channel's permeability characteristics. Channel gating is a far more elusive target because it involves molecular rearrangements, which are poorly understood at any level of description and which may be modified by the channel's environment. The general mechanisms of ion permeation and gating will differ among different classes of ion channels, but a molecular understanding of either phenomenon must eventually be based on an understanding of intermolecular forces, which are invariant among all channel types.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1279736     DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.suppl_4.S89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rev        ISSN: 0031-9333            Impact factor:   37.312


  77 in total

1.  Nonlinear thermodynamic models of voltage-dependent currents.

Authors:  A Destexhe; J R Huguenard
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Three-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory studies: influence of membrane electrostatics on gramicidin A channel conductance.

Authors:  A E Cárdenas; R D Coalson; M G Kurnikova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. II. Trp conformations and dipole potentials in gramicidin A.

Authors:  A E Dorigo; D G Anderson; D D Busath
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Gramicidin A channel as a test ground for molecular dynamics force fields.

Authors:  Toby W Allen; Turgut Baştuğ; Serdar Kuyucak; Shin-Ho Chung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Modulation of the Shaker K(+) channel gating kinetics by the S3-S4 linker.

Authors:  C Gonzalez; E Rosenman; F Bezanilla; O Alvarez; R Latorre
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  The intrinsic electrostatic potential and the intermediate ring of charge in the acetylcholine receptor channel.

Authors:  G G Wilson; J M Pascual; N Brooijmans; D Murray; A Karlin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Energetics of ion conduction through the gramicidin channel.

Authors:  Toby W Allen; Olaf S Andersen; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The role of the dielectric barrier in narrow biological channels: a novel composite approach to modeling single-channel currents.

Authors:  Artem B Mamonov; Rob D Coalson; Abraham Nitzan; Maria G Kurnikova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Theoretical study of the structure and dynamic fluctuations of dioxolane-linked gramicidin channels.

Authors:  Ching-Hsing Yu; Samuel Cukierman; Régis Pomès
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  On the importance of atomic fluctuations, protein flexibility, and solvent in ion permeation.

Authors:  Toby W Allen; O S Andersen; Benoit Roux
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.