BACKGROUND: There is evidence suggesting that atrial fibrillation (AF) may be induced by acute increase of atrial pressure. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness, and on the frequency of induction of (AF), in patients with a history of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in this study. The patients were divided in two groups: the LAF group, and the control group. None of the patients in either group had organic heart disease. Effective refractory period (ERP) and duration of atrial extrastimulus electrogram (A(2)) were measured at two right atrial sites (high lateral wall, atrial appendage) during AV pacing (cycle length: 500 msec) with different AV intervals. Peak, minimal and mean atrial pressure increased from 8.57 +/- 2.37 to 18.14 +/- 4.74 mm Hg, 2 +/- 2.23 to 5.14 +/- 2.60 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) and from 4.28 +/- 1.6 mm Hg to 9.77 +/- 2.9 mm Hg (p = 0.001), respectively during AV interval modification. During lateral and atrial appendage pacing, with a progressive decrease of AV interval to 160, 100, 80, 40, 0 msec, the ERP, the dispersion of ERP, functional refractory period (FRP), A2 and latency period (LP) did not change significantly, in both groups. The frequency of induction of AF was not statistically different in both lateral atrial wall and appendage, during pacing in different AV intervals. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that alterations in the intraatrial pressure does not have important effects on atrial refractoriness and does not increase vulnerability to AF in patients with a history of LAF.
BACKGROUND: There is evidence suggesting that atrial fibrillation (AF) may be induced by acute increase of atrial pressure. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness, and on the frequency of induction of (AF), in patients with a history of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in this study. The patients were divided in two groups: the LAF group, and the control group. None of the patients in either group had organic heart disease. Effective refractory period (ERP) and duration of atrial extrastimulus electrogram (A(2)) were measured at two right atrial sites (high lateral wall, atrial appendage) during AV pacing (cycle length: 500 msec) with different AV intervals. Peak, minimal and mean atrial pressure increased from 8.57 +/- 2.37 to 18.14 +/- 4.74 mm Hg, 2 +/- 2.23 to 5.14 +/- 2.60 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) and from 4.28 +/- 1.6 mm Hg to 9.77 +/- 2.9 mm Hg (p = 0.001), respectively during AV interval modification. During lateral and atrial appendage pacing, with a progressive decrease of AV interval to 160, 100, 80, 40, 0 msec, the ERP, the dispersion of ERP, functional refractory period (FRP), A2 and latency period (LP) did not change significantly, in both groups. The frequency of induction of AF was not statistically different in both lateral atrial wall and appendage, during pacing in different AV intervals. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that alterations in the intraatrial pressure does not have important effects on atrial refractoriness and does not increase vulnerability to AF in patients with a history of LAF.
Authors: H Calkins; R el-Atassi; A Leon; S Kalbfleisch; M Borganelli; J Langberg; F Morady Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Gergely Ágoston; Judit Szilágyi; Gábor Bencsik; Cristina Tutuianu; Gergely Klausz; László Sághy; Albert Varga; Tamás Forster; Róbert Pap Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 1.900