Literature DB >> 12794572

Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution.

Susan C Parker1, Michael P Spencer, Robert D Madoff, Linda L Jensen, W Douglas Wong, David A Rothenberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate a single-institution experience with the Acticon artificial bowel sphincter for the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence.
METHODS: At the University of Minnesota, 45 consecutive patients underwent artificial bowel sphincter placement (Group I, 1989-1992, n = 10; Group II, 1997-2001, n = 35). Group I was reviewed retrospectively and Group II prospectively.
RESULTS: The outcome for Group I patients was initially reported in 1995 (mean age, 32; range, 15-52 years; 7 males). Of these 10 patients, 4 required explantation (2 required stomas), and 6 have a functional artificial bowel sphincter; 2 patients had devices successfully replaced for fluid leaks (at 6 and 10 years). In Group II, artificial bowel sphincter placement was attempted in 37 patients and was successful in 35 (mean age, 47; range, 18-72 years; 11 males). A total of 14 patients required explantation, 12 (34 percent) for infection and 2 (6 percent) for pain. In total, 13 patients have required 21 revisions, including 7 complete device replacements. The infection rate for revisions was 19 percent; four patients required explantation after revisions. Of 18 patients whose artificial bowel sphincter failed, 9 required a stoma. In all, 17 (49 percent) patients have a functional artificial bowel sphincter. In Group II fecal incontinence severity scores decreased from a mean of 103 preimplant to 59 at one year and to 23 at two or more years (P < 0.001) in patients who retained their devices. Quality of life scores improved in all patients at six months and at one year (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Artificial bowel sphincter therapy leads to long-term improved continence and quality of life in patients whose implantation is successful. Success rates have not improved in the two patient groups, with infection remaining a major challenge. However, once successfully established, artificial bowel sphincter function remains stable for many years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12794572     DOI: 10.1097/01.DCR.0000070530.79998.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  19 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence: part 4 of a series of articles on incontinence.

Authors:  Michael Probst; Helen Pages; Jürgen F Riemann; Axel Eickhoff; Franz Raulf; Gerd Kolbert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Challenges faced in the clinical application of artificial anal sphincters.

Authors:  Ming-hui Wang; Ying Zhou; Shuang Zhao; Yun Luo
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Christophe Müller; Orlin Belyaev; Thomas Deska; Ansgar Chromik; Dirk Weyhe; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Sacral neuromodulation stimulation in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Tracy L Hull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence: a critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature.

Authors:  Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Care of the patient with anorectal trauma.

Authors:  Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-12

8.  The current status of the Acticon Neosphincter.

Authors:  Sharon G Gregorcyk
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

9.  Overlapping sphincteroplasty: is it the standard of care?

Authors:  Laura H Goetz; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

10.  [Fecal incontinence].

Authors:  J Braun; S Willis
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.