Literature DB >> 21932054

The Hounsfield value for cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus--an in vitro study.

Daren Lim Fat1, Jim Kennedy, Rose Galvin, Fergal O'Brien, Frank Mc Grath, Hannan Mullett.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal humerus represent a major osteoporotic burden. Recent developments in CT imaging have emphasized the importance of cortical bone thickness distribution in the prevention and management of fragility fractures. We aimed to experimentally define the CT density of cortical bone in the proximal humerus for building cortical geometry maps.
METHODS: With ethical approval, we used ten fresh-frozen human proximal humeri. These were stripped of all soft tissue and high-resolution CT images were then taken. The humeral heads were then subsequently resected to allow access to the metaphyseal area. Using curettes, cancellous bone was removed down to hard cortical bone. Another set of CT images of the reamed specimen was then taken. Using CT imaging software and a CAD interface, we then compared cortical contours at different CT density thresholds to the reference inner cortical contour of our reamed specimens. Working with 3D model representations of these cortical maps, we were able to accurately make distance comparison analyses based on different CT thresholds.
RESULTS: We could compute a single closest value at 700 HU. No difference was found in the HU-based contours generated along the 500-900 HU pixels (p = 1.000). The contours were significantly different from those generated at 300, 400, 1,000, and 1,100 HU.
CONCLUSIONS: A Hounsfield range of 500-900 HU can accurately depict cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus. Thresholding outside this range leads to statistically significant inaccuracies. Our results concur with a similar range reported in the literature for the proximal femur. Knowledge of regional variations in cortical bone thickness has direct implications for basic science studies on osteoporosis and its treatment, but is also important for the orthopedic surgeon since our decision for treatment options is often guided by local bone quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21932054     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1255-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  28 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Robertson; J Yuan; L U Bigliani; E L Flatow; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head.

Authors:  A S Liew; J A Johnson; S D Patterson; G J King; D G Chess
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants.

Authors:  Frank Adam; D S Hammer; D Pape; D Kohn
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-01-12       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  A knowledge-based computer-aided design and manufacturing system for total hip replacement.

Authors:  J D Reuben; C H Chang; J E Akin; D R Lionberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Dietrich von Stechow; David Zurakowski; Jon J Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05

Review 6.  Innovations in the management of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Shane J Nho; Robert H Brophy; Joseph U Barker; Charles N Cornell; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Accurate quantification of width and density of bone structures by computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas N Hangartner; David F Short
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women.

Authors:  K Lippuner; H Johansson; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures.

Authors:  Peter M de Bakker; Sarah L Manske; Vincent Ebacher; Thomas R Oxland; Peter A Cripton; Pierre Guy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessment of osteoporosis using pelvic diagnostic computed tomography.

Authors:  Yee-Suk Kim; Seunghun Lee; Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Bong-Gun Lee
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Computer tomographic analysis of anatomic characteristics of the ulna - essential parameters for preshaped implants.

Authors:  Johannes Christof Hopf; Andreas Jähnig; Tobias Jorg; Ruben Sebastian Westphal; Daniel Wagner; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Association between forearm cortical bone properties and handgrip strength in women with distal radius fractures: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Seok Woo Hong; Jeong-Hyun Kang; Jong Seop Kim; Hyun Sik Gong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Trabecular bone density distribution in the scapula of patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joshua H Ehrlich; Valeria Vendries; Timothy J Bryant; Michael J Rainbow; Heidi L Ploeg; Ryan T Bicknell
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-10-23

5.  Cetaceans Humerus Radiodensity by CT: A Useful Technique Differentiating between Species, Ecophysiology, and Age.

Authors:  Francesco Maria Achille Consoli; Yara Bernaldo de Quirós; Manuel Arbelo; Stefania Fulle; Marco Marchisio; Mario Encinoso; Antonio Fernandez; Miguel A Rivero
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  X-ray attenuation of bone, soft and adipose tissue in CT from 70 to 140 kV and comparison with 3D printable additive manufacturing materials.

Authors:  Xiangjie Ma; Michael Figl; Ewald Unger; Martin Buschmann; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Trabecular bone density distribution in the scapula relevant to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matt A Daalder; Gabriel Venne; Varun Sharma; Michael Rainbow; Timothy Bryant; Ryan T Bicknell
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-08-01

8.  On the optimization of bone SPECT/CT in terms of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Monika Tulik; Piotr Tulik; Teresa Kowalska
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.