Literature DB >> 12791854

Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood.

Stanley Mirrett1, L Barth Reller, Cathy A Petti, Christopher W Woods, Bindu Vazirani, Rekha Sivadas, Melvin P Weinstein.   

Abstract

Standard aerobic media are widely used for culturing blood with the BacT/ALERT (BioMérieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) (BM) and BACTEC 9240 (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) (BD) automated continuously monitoring instrument systems. Although similarly composed of soybean-casein digest broths, the formulations of the standard aerobic media available for these instruments differ from each other in supplements and in sodium polyanetholesulfonate concentration. Therefore, we compared the standard aerobic media available for these systems at two university hospitals. Blood samples from adult patients with suspected bloodstream infection were inoculated at the bedside into nonvented BM and BD standard aerobic blood culture bottles and incubated in their respective instruments. The laboratories received 6,743 pairs of bottles that were each filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 523 isolates representing true infections were recovered from 257 patients; of these isolates, 348 were recovered from both the BD and the BM bottles, 108 were recovered from the BM bottles only, and 67 were recovered from the BD bottles only (P < 0.005). More staphylococci (P < 0.05), especially coagulase-negative staphylococci (P < 0.05), and yeasts (P < 0.01) were recovered from BM bottles than from BD bottles. Of 291 unimicrobial episodes of bloodstream infection, 220 were detected with both bottles, 41 were detected with the BM bottles only, and 30 were detected with the BD bottles only (difference not significant). Among 335 cultures that were positive in both bottles within the first 72 h of incubation, the median times to detection were 14 h for BM bottles and 13 h for BD bottles. Rates for false-positive results were 0.5% for BM bottles and 0.1% for BD bottles. One BM bottle and seven BD bottles yielded false-negative results. We conclude that the BM medium provides improved recovery of microorganisms, especially staphylococci and yeasts, compared with that provided by the BD medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12791854      PMCID: PMC156516          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2391-2394.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; M L Towns; S M Quartey; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; G Parmigiani; L B Reller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; M L Wilson; S Smith-Elekes; C R Chuard; K L Joho; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; L B Reller; J R Murphy; K A Lichtenstein
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb

4.  Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.

Authors:  M L Wilson; M P Weinstein; L G Reimer; S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems.

Authors:  P Zwadyk; C L Pierson; C Young
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Controlled evaluation of 5 versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; M L Wilson; L G Reimer; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systems.

Authors:  W C Hellinger; J J Cawley; S Alvarez; S F Hogan; W S Harmsen; D M Ilstrup; F R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis.

Authors:  L Klingspor; S A Muhammed; V Ozenci
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Detection of bacteria in red blood cell concentrates by the Scansystem method.

Authors:  S Ribault; A Faucon; L Grave; P Nannini; I Besson Faure
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Biographical feature: Melvin P. Weinstein, M.D.

Authors:  Betty A Forbes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  High medical impact of implementing the new polymeric bead-based BacT/ALERT® FAPlus and FNPlus blood culture bottles in standard care.

Authors:  R Amarsy-Guerle; F Mougari; H Jacquier; J Oliary; H Benmansour; J Riahi; B Berçot; L Raskine; E Cambau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Sensitivity and specificity of typhoid fever rapid antibody tests for laboratory diagnosis at two sub-Saharan African sites.

Authors:  Karen H Keddy; Arvinda Sooka; Maupi E Letsoalo; Greta Hoyland; Claire Lise Chaignat; Anne B Morrissey; John A Crump
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Predominance of Enterobacteriaceae isolates in early positive anaerobic blood culture bottles in BacT/Alert system.

Authors:  Tzong-Shi Chiueh; Shih-Yi Lee; Sheng-Hui Tang; Jang-Jih Lu; Jun-Ren Sun
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Direct comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D automated blood culture systems for candida growth detection.

Authors:  Lynn L Horvath; Benjamin J George; Clinton K Murray; Linda S Harrison; Duane R Hospenthal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Blood Culture Bottle and Standard Culture Bottle Methods for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion.

Authors:  Surapan Charoentunyarak; Sarassawan Kananuraks; Jarin Chindaprasirt; Panita Limpawattana; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.747

10.  The Performance of the Four Anaerobic Blood Culture Bottles BacT/ALERT-FN, -FN Plus, BACTEC-Plus and -Lytic in Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria and Identification by Direct MALDI-TOF MS.

Authors:  Mohammed Almuhayawi; Osman Altun; Adam Dilshad Abdulmajeed; Måns Ullberg; Volkan Özenci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.