Literature DB >> 12790956

Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction.

E Mylonakis1, M Scarpa, M Barollo, C Yarnoz, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term hernia rate and risk factors after end colostomy construction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 86 patients with a permanent end colostomy constructed over 5 years were examined and interviewed. There were 35 men and the mean age was 56.5 (28-87) years. Risk factors which were analysed included emergency operation, age over 60 years, obesity, steroids, cancer, infection at the stoma site, smoking and chronic obstructive airways disease.
RESULTS: Para-colostomy hernia occurred in 12/86 cases (13.9%). The cumulative recurrence rose with duration of follow up. Overall 10/45 patients (22%) over 60 years developed hernia vs. 2/41 patients (4.8%) less than 60 years (P=0.02). There were no other risk factors that correlated with para-colostomy hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the incidence of colostomy related hernia increases with follow up and is significantly higher in patients over the age of 60. Other risk factors, particularly obesity and coexisting cardiorespiratory disease, have no impact.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12790956     DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00256.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  10 in total

1.  Early complications after stoma formation: a prospective cohort study in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  H A Formijne Jonkers; W A Draaisma; A M Roskott; A J van Overbeeke; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Parastomal hernia repair.

Authors:  Conor H O'Neill; Edward C Borrazzo; Neil H Hyman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Relationship between stoma creation route for end colostomy and parastomal hernia development after laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Hitoshi Hino; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Masakatsu Numata; Akinobu Furutani; Takuya Suzuki; Kakeru Torii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; William S Cobb; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Stoma issues in the obese patient.

Authors:  Sandra J Beck
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-12

Review 6.  Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation.

Authors:  F Helgstrand; I Gögenur; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Yeun Ju Sohn; Sun Mi Moon; Ui Sup Shin; Sun Hee Jee
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-31

8.  Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation.

Authors:  Julia Hardt; Joerg J Meerpohl; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post; Florian Herrle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 9.  Prophylactic Mesh Application during Colostomy to Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  JunJia Zhu; YuWei Pu; XiaoDong Yang; DeBao Zhang; Kui Zhao; Wei Peng; ChunGen Xing
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  An Analysis of the Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Faiza H Soomro; Sufyan Azam; Sritharan Ganeshmoorthy; Peter Waterland
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.