Literature DB >> 16769548

Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: a comparative analysis.

Michael J Rosen1, William S Cobb, Kent W Kercher, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

Open colostomy reversal carries significant rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia which often limit its acceptance. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach to the restoration of intestinal continuity may result in lower perioperative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic colostomy reversals performed at a single institution were identified and compared to 22 randomly selected open colostomy closures performed during the same time period. Patients were compared based on demographics, previous indications for colostomy procedures, and perioperative outcomes. A total of 152 patients underwent reversal of left-sided colostomies during the study period. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 of 22 cases; there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to inability to adequately mobilize the rectal stump. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable based on mean age (54 years versus 49 years; P = 0.23), BMI (26 kg/m(2) versus 27 kg/m(2); P = 0.66), gender (9% males versus 13% males; P = 0.23), ASA Class (2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.07), and history of previous intra-abdominal sepsis (17 versus 16 cases). Operative times were similar (158 versus 189 minutes; P = 0.16), and estimated blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113 versus 270 ml; P = 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred in the laparoscopic group and two enterotomies occurred in the open group. The laparoscopic group had earlier passage of flatus (3.5 versus 5.0 days; P = 0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 versus 7.3 days; P = 0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) laparoscopic and 13 (59%) open cases (P = 0.01). There was no mortality in this series. The laparoscopic approach can be safely used in the restoration of intestinal continuity. It results in a decreased perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, and it offers distinct advantages over the open approach to colostomy reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16769548     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  14 in total

1.  Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  N W Pearce; S D Scott; S J Karran
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Restoration of digestive continuity after Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  S Ayaon Albarran; Ch Simoens; H Takeh; P Mendes da Costa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

3.  Quality of life in stoma patients.

Authors:  K P Nugent; P Daniels; B Stewart; R Patankar; C D Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a simplified technique and audit of twelve cases.

Authors:  S C Macpherson; D T Hansell; C Porteous
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1996-10

5.  Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann procedure.

Authors:  A M Vernava; G Liebscher; W E Longo
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-04

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  J L Sosa; D Sleeman; I Puente; M G McKenney; R Hartmann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure.

Authors:  G N Costantino; G G Mukalian
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-12

8.  Laparoscopically assisted colorectal anastomose post-Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  F S Regadas; J A Siebra; L V Rodrigues; A M Nicodemo; J A Reis Neto
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1996-02

9.  Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction.

Authors:  E Mylonakis; M Scarpa; M Barollo; C Yarnoz; M R Keighley
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure revisited.

Authors:  Jane C Holland; Desmond C Winter; Denis Richardson
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.719

View more
  20 in total

1.  Incision-less reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  H M Joshi; M P Gosselink; S Adusumilli; C Cunningham; I Lindsey; O M Jones
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

3.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure through the stomal side: a new even more minimal invasive technique.

Authors:  Jefrey Vermeulen; Wietske Vrijland; Guido H H Mannaerts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure utilizing single-port laparoscopy: an attractive alternative to laparotomy.

Authors:  Stefan H E M Clermonts; Winanda M J de Ruijter; Yu-Ting T van Loon; Dareczka K Wasowicz; Joos Heisterkamp; John K Maring; David D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Federico Costantino; Didier Mutter; Jacopo D'Agostino; Mario Dente; Joël Leroy; Hurng Sheng Wu; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Assessing trends in laparoscopic colostomy reversal and evaluating outcomes when compared to open procedures.

Authors:  Kevin Y Pei; Kimberly A Davis; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  R S Turley; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Minimally invasive stomas.

Authors:  Michael D Hellinger; Abdullah Al Haddad
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.