Literature DB >> 27553802

Relationship between stoma creation route for end colostomy and parastomal hernia development after laparoscopic surgery.

Hitoshi Hino1, Tomohiro Yamaguchi2, Yusuke Kinugasa1, Akio Shiomi1, Hiroyasu Kagawa1, Yushi Yamakawa1, Masakatsu Numata1, Akinobu Furutani1, Takuya Suzuki1, Kakeru Torii1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic benefits of extraperitoneal colostomy with laparoscopic surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the route for stoma creation with laparoscopic surgery and stoma-related complications, especially parastomal hernia (PSH).
METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2015, a total of 59 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann procedure were investigated. Patient demographic and treatment characteristics, including stoma-related complications, were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal colostomy were performed in 29 and 30 patients, respectively. Median follow-up duration was 21 months (range: 2-95). Patient demographic and treatment characteristics were comparable between the transperitoneal group (TPG) and the extraperitoneal group (EPG). PSH developed in 12 (41 %) patients in TPG, and 4 (13 %) patients in EPG (p = 0.020). The incidence of other stoma-related complications and non-stoma-related complications did not differ significantly between TPG and EPG. No patient characteristics except for transperitoneal route for stoma creation were associated with PSH development.
CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal route for stoma creation is associated with a significantly lower incidence of PSH development after laparoscopic surgery. Whenever possible, extraperitoneal colostomy should be recommended, even with laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominoperineal resection; Extraperitoneal route; Hartmann procedure; Laparoscopic surgery; Parastomal hernia; Transperitoneal route

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553802     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5198-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernias: early results.

Authors:  Karl A LeBlanc; Drake E Bellanger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyuki Tomioka; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Shin Fujita; Takayuki Akasu; Junki Mizusawa; Norio Saito; Yusuke Kinugasa; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Masayuki Ohue; Shoichi Fujii; Manabu Shiozawa; Takashi Yamaguchi; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies.

Authors:  M T Cheung; N H Chia; W Y Chiu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Madoka Hamada; Kazuhide Ozaki; Genya Muraoka; Naoya Kawakita; Yutaka Nishioka
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon's experience in 66 patients.

Authors:  Dieter Berger; Marc Bientzle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy.

Authors:  E E Londono-Schimmer; A P Leong; R K Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Klaus Ludwig
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Yeun Ju Sohn; Sun Mi Moon; Ui Sup Shin; Sun Hee Jee
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-31

10.  A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Heiying; Du Yonghong; Wang Xiaofeng; Yao Hang; Wu Kunlan; Zhang Bei; Zhang Jinhao; Leng Qiang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-01-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy using the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair technique after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroki Takahashi; Korehito Takasu; Seiichi Nakaya; Takeshi Yanagita; Nanako Ando; Nozomu Nakai; Yuzo Maeda; Kazuyoshi Shiga; Takahisa Hirokawa; Mamoru Morimoto; Ryo Ogawa; Masayasu Hara; Yoichi Matsuo; Shuji Takiguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy has a lower risk of parastomal hernia and bowel obstruction than transperitoneal colostomy.

Authors:  Emi Ota; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Toshiya Nagasaki; Hironori Fukuoka; Toshiki Mukai; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Takashi Akiyoshi; Yosuke Fukunaga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  A technique for laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy with an intact posterior sheath of rectus.

Authors:  Zeyu Li; Lifei Tian; Ruiting Liu; Bobo Zheng; Ben Wang; Xu Zhao; Pan Quan; Jian Qiu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.030

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.