Literature DB >> 12788747

Use of PCR for direct detection of Campylobacter species in bovine feces.

G Douglas Inglis1, Lisa D Kalischuk.   

Abstract

This study reports on the use of PCR to directly detect and distinguish Campylobacter species in bovine feces without enrichment. Inhibitors present in feces are a major obstacle to using PCR to detect microorganisms. The QIAamp DNA stool minikit was found to be an efficacious extraction method, as determined by the positive amplification of internal control DNA added to bovine feces before extraction. With nested or seminested multiplex PCR, Campylobacter coli, C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, and C. jejuni were detected in all fecal samples inoculated at approximately 10(4) CFU g(-1), and 50 to 83% of the samples inoculated at approximately 10(3) CFU g(-1) were positive. At approximately 10(2) CFU g(-1), C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, and C. jejuni (17 to 50% of the samples) but not C. coli were detected by PCR. From uninoculated bovine feces, a total of 198 arbitrarily selected isolates of Campylobacter were recovered on four commonly used isolation media incubated at three temperatures. The most frequently isolated taxa were C. jejuni (152 isolates) and C. lanienae (42 isolates), but isolates of C. fetus subsp. fetus, Arcobacter butzleri, and A. skirrowii also were recovered (</=2 isolates per taxon). Considerable variability was observed in the frequency of isolation of campylobacters among the four media and three incubation temperatures tested. With genus-specific primers, Campylobacter DNA was detected in 75% of the fecal samples, representing an 8% increase in sensitivity relative to that obtained with microbiological isolation across the four media and three incubation temperatures tested. With nested primers, C. jejuni and C. lanienae were detected in 25 and 67% of the samples, respectively. In no instance was DNA from either C. coli, C. fetus, or C. hyointestinalis detected in uninoculated bovine feces. PCR was more sensitive than isolation on microbiological media for detecting C. lanienae (17%) but not C. jejuni. Campylobacters are a diverse and fastidious group of bacteria, and the development of direct PCR not only will increase the understanding of Campylobacter species diversity and their frequency of occurrence in feces but also will enhance the knowledge of their role in the gastrointestinal tract of livestock and of the factors that influence shedding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12788747      PMCID: PMC161499          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3435-3447.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  Prevalence and infection risks of zoonotic enteropathogenic bacteria in Swiss cow-calf farms.

Authors:  A Busato; D Hofer; T Lentze; C Gaillard; A Burnens
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1999-09-29       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 2.  Diseases due to Campylobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria.

Authors:  M B Skirrow
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.311

3.  Extensive 16S rRNA gene sequence diversity in Campylobacter hyointestinalis strains: taxonomic and applied implications.

Authors:  C S Harrington; S L On
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-07

4.  Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model.

Authors:  L Monteiro; D Bonnemaison; A Vekris; K G Petry; J Bonnet; R Vidal; J Cabrita; F Mégraud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A nested PCR assay for the detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in tracheobronchiolar washings from pigs.

Authors:  E Verdin; C Saillard; A Labbé; J M Bové; M Kobisch
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Polymerase chain reaction detection and speciation of Campylobacter upsaliensis and C. helveticus in human faeces and comparison with culture techniques.

Authors:  A J Lawson; D Linton; J Stanley; R J Owen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Campylobacter lanienae sp. nov., a new species isolated from workers in an abattoir.

Authors:  J M Logan; A Burnens; D Linton; A J Lawson; J Stanley
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Inclusion of polyvinylpyrrolidone in the polymerase chain reaction reverses the inhibitory effects of polyphenolic contamination of RNA.

Authors:  P K Koonjul; W F Brandt; J M Farrant; G G Lindsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The use of mimics as internal standards to avoid false negatives in diagnostic PCR.

Authors:  A Ballagi-Pordány; S Belák
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  The seasonal variation of thermophilic campylobacters in beef cattle, dairy cattle and calves.

Authors:  K N Stanley; J S Wallace; J E Currie; P J Diggle; K Jones
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  37 in total

1.  Colonization of cattle intestines by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Lisa D Kalischuk; Hilma W Busz; John P Kastelic
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Temporal prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp. from beef cattle in Alberta feedlots.

Authors:  G D Inglis; D W Morck; T A McAllister; T Entz; M E Olson; L J Yanke; R R Read
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Atypical Helicobacter canadensis strains associated with swine.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Malcolm McConville; Anno de Jong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Marianne Lund; Steen Nordentoft; Karl Pedersen; Mogens Madsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Toward standardization of diagnostic PCR testing of fecal samples: lessons from the detection of salmonellae in pigs.

Authors:  B Malorny; J Hoorfar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Distribution and ecology of campylobacters in coastal plain streams (Georgia, United States of America).

Authors:  Ethell Vereen; R Richard Lowrance; Dana J Cole; Erin K Lipp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Lyophilization prior to direct DNA extraction from bovine feces improves the quantification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Delphine Rapp; John Waller; Gale Brightwell; Richard W Muirhead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Prevalence of mcr-1 in the Cecal Contents of Food Animals in the United States.

Authors:  Richard J Meinersmann; Scott R Ladely; Jodie R Plumblee; Kimberly L Cook; Eileen Thacker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Effects of subtherapeutic administration of antimicrobial agents to beef cattle on the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter hyointestinalis.

Authors:  G D Inglis; T A McAllister; H W Busz; L J Yanke; D W Morck; M E Olson; R R Read
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Development and application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction method for Campylobacter jejuni detection.

Authors:  Mao-Jun Zhang; Bo Qiao; Xue-Bin Xu; Jian-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.