Literature DB >> 12788117

Assessment of visual function after corneal transplantation: the quality of life and psychometric assessment after corneal transplantation (Q-PACT) study.

Flavia Mendes1, Debra A Schaumberg, Sam Navon, Roger Steinert, Joel Sugar, Edward J Holland, M Reza Dana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many patients with successful corneal grafts have poor vision postoperatively. This study evaluates changes in vision-related quality of life after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study.
METHOD: Penetrating keratoplasty candidates from the university-affiliated ophthalmology clinics of four participating centers were enrolled and followed up prospectively. We used the PK-VFQ, a modified version of the Visual Function Index-14, combined with clinical examinations before and at 6 and 12 months after PK. We used multivariate linear regression models to examine predictors of change in PK-VFQ scores.
RESULTS: We studied 74 grafts in 71 eyes of 67 patients aged 23 to 91 (mean, 61) years who were followed up for at least 6 months. Indications for surgery included bullous keratopathy (27%), scarring (16%), keratoconus (16%), dystrophies (16%), and regrafts (15%). Median preoperative visual acuity was 20/200 in the graft candidate and 20/30 in the best eye. Median best-corrected postoperative visual acuity in the operated eyes was 20/60 at 6 months. PK-VFQ scores improved at 6 months in 79% by an average of 13.0 points (range, -16.7 to 67.5). Improvement in PK-VFQ scores was associated with younger age (P =.04), poorer preoperative visual acuity in the best eye (P =.001), and postoperative contact lens use (P =.04) but not with postoperative acuity in the grafted eye (P =.49). Postoperatively, 80% of patients were moderately to very satisfied with their vision, and 97% of patients stated they would have the surgery again.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in visual function is inversely associated with visual acuity in the better-seeing eye but does not correlate with the postoperative acuity in the grafted eye. Although most keratoplasties are done unilaterally in the setting of good visual acuity in the contralateral eye, for the majority of patients visual function improves after PK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12788117     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02278-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  12 in total

1.  [Satisfaction with penetrating keratoplasty. Results of a questionnaire census].

Authors:  D Böhringer; A Schindler; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Brow ptosis: are we measuring the right thing? The impact of surgery and the correlation of objective and subjective measures with postoperative improvement in quality-of-life.

Authors:  F Mellington; R Khooshabeh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Are our cornea waiting lists dynamic enough?

Authors:  Melis Palamar; Sait Egrilmez; Ayse Yagci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) improves vision-related quality of life.

Authors:  Alexandra Gellert; Jan Darius Unterlauft; Matus Rehak; Christian Girbardt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Vision-Related Quality of Life after Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Fardin Amiri; Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

6.  Vision-related quality of life in corneal graft recipients.

Authors:  S T Mak; A C-m Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Health status and patient satisfaction after corneal graft: results from the corneal transplant epidemiological study.

Authors:  Adriano Fasolo; Cristina Capuzzo; Michela Fornea; Anna Chiara Frigo; Cristina Monterosso; Alfonso Zampini; Antonio Avarello; Alessandro Galan; Sandro Sbordone; Adele Elisabetta Ragucci; Claudio Gorla; Francesco Grigoletto; Diego Ponzin
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes After Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Grace E Dunbar; Michael Titus; Joshua D Stein; Tomas E Meijome; Shahzad I Mian; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.152

9.  Prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem: impact at 5 years.

Authors:  Joshua S Agranat; Nicole R Kitos; Deborah S Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Indications and techniques employed for keratoplasty in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia: 6 years of experience.

Authors:  Khalid M Al-Arfai; Sanaa A Yassin; Ali S Al-Beshri; Mohanna Y Al-Jindan; Elham R Al-Tamimi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.