Literature DB >> 12785068

Inhibition of return and manual pointing movements.

Martin H Fischer1, Jay Pratt, Sebastiaan F W Neggers.   

Abstract

To examine whether the motor inhibition of return (IOR) postulated by Taylor and Klein (1998, 2000) generalizes to manual guided movements or is restricted to saccadic responses, the following three experiments were conducted. The first experiment combined peripheral cues (which generate IOR) with four types of manual responses made to central targets (central arrow indicating the response location). The responses were made on a touch-screen and were the equivalent of either a detection keypress, a choice keypress, a detection-guided pointing movement, or a choice-guided pointing movement. No IOR was found for any of the responses. The second experiment replicated the main result under eye fixation control. In Experiment 3, peripheral cues and peripheral targets were used, and IOR was present in all responses. Overall, these finding suggest that motor-based IOR is restricted to the oculomotor system. Implications for motor-based IOR and attention-based IOR are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12785068     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Crystal Au; Irene T Armstrong; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of hand termination and accuracy constraint on eye-hand coordination during sequential two-segment movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial interactions between consecutive manual responses.

Authors:  Brittany Avery; Christopher D Cowper-Smith; David A Westwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Saccades and reaches, behaving differently.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Andrew L Gardella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Objects or Locations in Vision for Action? Evidence from the MILO task.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-01-01

8.  Inhibition of return in cue-target and target-target tasks.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23

10.  Spatial interactions between successive eye and arm movements: signal type matters.

Authors:  Christopher D Cowper-Smith; Jonathan Harris; Gail A Eskes; David A Westwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.