Literature DB >> 12783253

Staging of colonic neoplasms by colonoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography.

N Stergiou1, N Haji-Kermani, C Schneider, D Menke, F Köckerling, T Wehrmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In contrast to the situation in the upper gastrointestinal tract staging of colonic neoplasm by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has not gained importance because until yet preoperative staging is without any clinical consequences. This may change with the introduction of minimally invasive surgical procedures and endoscopic resection techniques as an alternative to conventional (open) surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed EUS with a miniprobe in 54 consecutive patients with colonic tumors who had been referred to our hospital for endoscopic resection or for laparoscopic resection of their lesions. Therefore patients with locally advanced tumors or systemic tumor spread were not included. After detection of the lesion during colonoscopy miniprobe EUS was performed with water-filling of the colonic lumen. The depth of invasion (T classification) and the local lymph node status (positive or negative) was ascertained. Lymph node-negative lesions staged as T1 underwent endoscopic resection whenever this was technically possible. In lymph node-negative T2-3 tumors laparoscopic resection was planned if they were localized at least 10 cm apart from the flexuras. All other lesions were resected by open surgery. The EUS findings were later compared with the final pathological results (pTN classification) of the resected specimen.
RESULTS: In 50 patients (93%) a sufficient EUS evaluation of the colonic tumor was possible. In one patient with a tumor at the left flexura the lesion could not be completely visualized, and in three patients a sufficient water filling of the colon was impossible. The infiltration depth was correctly classified in 17 adenomas, 16 T1, 8 T2, 5 T3, and one T4-carcinoma (EUS accuracy for T staging: 94%). Two T2 and one T3 carcinoma were overstaged by EUS while no understaging was recorded. The lymph node status was correctly classified in 42/50 patients (84%), and a false-negative lymph node status was found in only 4/50 cases (8%). The overall accuracy of EUS was 80%.
CONCLUSION: Miniprobe EUS is suitable and has a sufficient but not optimal accuracy for staging of colonic neoplasm. Its employment makes sense if minimally invasive resection techniques in patients with high-risk for open surgery are planned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783253     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-003-0506-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  N K Kim; M J Kim; S H Yun; S K Sohn; J S Min
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  [Errors and risks in oncologic laparoscopic surgery].

Authors:  F Köckerling; M A Reymond; C Schneider; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Pre-operative staging of recto-sigmoid colon carcinoma by upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  L J Tseng; L R Mo; L T Thian; Y T Jao
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

6.  Colorectal carcinoma: laparoscopic versus traditional open surgery. A clinical trial.

Authors:  E Santoro; M Carlini; F Carboni; A Feroce
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

7.  Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer by a 15 MHz ultrasound miniprobe.

Authors:  S Hamada; K Akahoshi; Y Chijiiwa; I Sasaki; H Nawata
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Pre-operative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography?

Authors:  J Beynon; N J Mortensen; D M Foy; J L Channer; J Virjee; P Goddard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; S M Ehrlich; G Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  11 in total

1.  High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy or high frequency 20 MHz mini probe endoscopic ultrasound staging for early colorectal neoplasia: a comparative prospective analysis.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S Brown; S S Cross; A J Shorthouse; D S Sanders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Role of endoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography in diagnosis of submucosal tumor of large intestine.

Authors:  Ping-Hong Zhou; Li-Qing Yao; Yun-Shi Zhong; Guo-Jie He; Mei-Dong Xu; Xin-Yu Qin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoluminal ultrasound biomicroscopy as a reliable tool for in vivo assessment of colonic inflammation in rats.

Authors:  Marcelo Alexandre Pinto de Britto; Rossana Colla Soletti; Alberto Schanaider; Kalil Madi; Heitor Siffert Pereira de Souza; João Carlos Machado
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Forward-viewing radial-array echoendoscope for staging of colon cancer beyond the rectum.

Authors:  Pradermchai Kongkam; Sittikorn Linlawan; Satimai Aniwan; Narisorn Lakananurak; Suparat Khemnark; Chucheep Sahakitrungruang; Jirawat Pattanaarun; Supakij Khomvilai; Naruemon Wisedopas; Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Manoop S Bhutani; Pinit Kullavanijaya; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Simultaneous follow-up of mouse colon lesions by colonoscopy and endoluminal ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Rossana C Soletti; Kelly Z Alves; Marcelo A P de Britto; Dyanna G de Matos; Mônica Soldan; Helena L Borges; João C Machado
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical significance of the muscle-retracting sign during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Takashi Toyonaga; Shinwa Tanaka; Mariko Man-I; James East; Wataru Ono; Eisei Nishino; Tsukasa Ishida; Namiko Hoshi; Yoshinori Morita; Takeshi Azuma
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-05-05

Review 7.  Endoscopic ultrasound for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie Louise Malmstrøm; Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Evaluation of subepithelial abnormalities of the appendix by endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Lance T Uradomo; Peter E Darwin
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2009-11-12

9.  Early duodenal adenocarcinoma resembling a submucosal tumor cured with endoscopic resection: a case report.

Authors:  Akira Dobashi; Kenichi Goda; Noboru Yoshimura; Kazuki Sumiyama; Hirobumi Toyoizumi; Shoichi Saito; Tomohiro Kato; Hiroki Ishikawa; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Hisao Tajiri; Masahiro Ikegami
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-04

10.  Miniprobe endoscopic ultrasonography has limitations in determining the T stage in early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pei Chuan Tsung; Jong Hyeok Park; You Sun Kim; Sun Young Kim; Won Wo Park; Hyun Tae Kim; Jin Nam Kim; Yun Kyung Kang; Jeong Seop Moon
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.