Literature DB >> 12777846

Xenogeneic thymokidney and thymic tissue transplantation in a pig-to-baboon model: I. Evidence for pig-specific T-cell unresponsiveness.

Rolf N Barth1, Shin Yamamoto, John C LaMattina, Naoki Kumagai, Hiroshi Kitamura, Parsia A Vagefi, Michel Awwad, Robert B Colvin, David K C Cooper, Megan Sykes, David H Sachs, Kazuhiko Yamada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential of xenotransplantation for clinical application will require overcoming barriers of humoral and cellular rejection, through strategies using immune suppression or tolerance induction. This laboratory has previously reported the induction of tolerance in the discordant xenogeneic model of pig-to-rodent thymic transplantation. We also have described a miniature swine model of fully mismatched allogeneic composite vascularized thymokidney transplantation that induced transplantation tolerance. We tested a combination of these approaches in a clinically relevant pig-to-primate model of xenotransplantation.
METHODS: Composite thymokidney grafts were prepared 40 to 80 days before transplantation by the autologous implantation of thymic tissue under the renal capsule of human decay-accelerating factor transgenic swine. Baboons received xenotransplants of both human decay-accelerating factor composite thymokidneys and omental implants of thymic tissue. Recipients were treated with an immunosuppressive-conditioning regimen including thymectomy or thymic irradiation, extracorporeal immunoadsorption of anti-alphaGal antibodies and T-cell depletion. Recipients were followed for indicators of xenograft rejection, T-cell depletion and reconstitution, anti-alphaGal antibody levels, and mixed lymphocyte responses. Immunologic responses were studied in those animals that survived for more than 3 weeks.
RESULTS: Thymokidney xenografts survived for up to 30 days, with evidence of viable thymic epithelium and Hassall's corpuscles under the renal capsule and in the omental implants, and with evidence of few host lymphocytes. Three animals demonstrated donor-specific unresponsiveness, while maintaining normal alloresponses, in mixed-lymphocyte-response assays performed after immunosuppression had been stopped. Rejected grafts demonstrated humoral damage without evidence of cellular infiltrates. After graftectomy, one animal maintained donor-specific cellular unresponsiveness and stable anti-alphaGal antibody levels for more than 2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that composite thymokidney and thymic-tissue xenotransplantation from swine to baboons can induce donor-specific cellular unresponsiveness and stable anti-alphaGal antibody levels, suggesting avoidance of sensitization after xenotransplantation. The presence of viable donor-swine thymic epithelium could have a role in the development of donor-specific T-cell tolerance. Further strategies to address humoral rejection could prolong graft survival and result in long-term tolerance to xenografts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12777846     DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000064335.50622.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  25 in total

1.  Pathologic characteristics of transplanted kidney xenografts.

Authors:  Akira Shimizu; Kazuhiko Yamada; Simon C Robson; David H Sachs; Robert B Colvin
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Occurrence of specific humoral non-responsiveness to swine antigens following administration of GalT-KO bone marrow to baboons.

Authors:  Adam Griesemer; Fan Liang; Atsushi Hirakata; Erica Hirsh; Diana Lo; Masayoshi Okumi; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada; Christene A Huang; David H Sachs
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  Quantification of baboon thymopoiesis in porcine thymokidney xenografts by the signal-joining T-cell receptor excision circle assay.

Authors:  Aseda Tena; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Robert J Hawley; Adam Griesemer; Kazuhiko Yamada; David H Sachs
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Xenotransplantation as a model of integrated, multidisciplinary research.

Authors:  Emanuele Cozzi; Erika Bosio; Michela Seveso; Domenico Rubello; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Results of gal-knockout porcine thymokidney xenografts.

Authors:  A D Griesemer; A Hirakata; A Shimizu; S Moran; A Tena; H Iwaki; Y Ishikawa; P Schule; J S Arn; S C Robson; J A Fishman; M Sykes; D H Sachs; K Yamada
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Reduced positive selection of a human TCR in a swine thymus using a humanized mouse model for xenotolerance induction.

Authors:  Grace Nauman; Chiara Borsotti; Nichole Danzl; Mohsen Khosravi-Maharlooei; Hao-Wei Li; Estefania Chavez; Samantha Stone; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 3.907

7.  Preparation of hybrid porcine thymus containing non-human primate thymic epithelial cells in miniature swine.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Sekijima; Hisashi Sahara; Akira Shimizu; Takehiro Iwanaga; Takahiro Murokawa; Yuichi Ariyoshi; Thomas Pomposelli; Mohsen Khosravi Maharlooei; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.907

8.  Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-31

Review 9.  Achieving tolerance in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: reality or fantasy.

Authors:  David H Sachs; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.708

Review 10.  Xenotransplantation: immunological hurdles and progress toward tolerance.

Authors:  Adam Griesemer; Kazuhiko Yamada; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.