BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic chimerism induces transplantation tolerance across allogeneic and xenogeneic barriers, but has been difficult to achieve in the pig-to-primate model. We have now utilized swine with knockout of the gene coding for alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (GalT-KO pigs) as bone marrow donors in an attempt to achieve chimerism and tolerance by avoiding the effects of natural antibodies to Gal determinants on pig hematopoietic cells. METHODS: Baboons (n = 4; Baboons 1 to 4 = B156, B158, B167, and B175, respectively) were splenectomized and conditioned with TBI (150 cGy), thymic irradiation (700 cGy), T cell depletion with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) and rat anti-primate CD2 (LoCD2b), and received FK506 and supportive therapy for 28 days. All animals received GalT-KO bone marrow (1 to 2 x 10(9) cells/kg) in two fractions on days 0 and 2, and were thereafter monitored for the presence of pig cells by flow cytometry, for porcine progenitor cells by PCR of BM colony-forming units, and for cellular reactivity to pig cells by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). In vitro antibody formation to LoCD2b and rATG was tested by ELISA; antibody reactivity to GalT-KO pig cells was tested by flow cytometry and cytotoxicity assays. Additionally, Baboons 3 and 4 received orthotopic kidney transplants on days 17 and 2, respectively, to test the potential impact of the protocol on renal transplantation. RESULTS: None of the animals showed detectable pig cells by flow cytometry for more than 12 h post-BM infusion. However, porcine progenitor cell engraftment, as evidenced by pig-derived colony forming units in the BM, as well as peripheral microchimerism in the thymus, lymph node, and peripheral blood was detected by PCR in baboons 1 and 2 for at least 28 days post-transplant. ELISA results confirmed humoral immunocompetence at time of transplantation as antibody titers to rat (LoCD2b) and rabbit (ATG) increased within 2 weeks. However, no induced antibodies to GalT-KO pig cells or increased donor specific cytotoxicity was detectable by flow cytometry. In contrast, baboons 3 and 4 developed serum antibodies to pig cells as well as to rat and rabbit immunoglobulin by day 14. Retrospective analysis revealed that although all four baboons possessed low levels of antibody-mediated cytotoxicity to GalT-KO cells prior to transplantation, the two baboons (3 and 4) that became sensitized to pig cells (and rejected pig kidneys) had relatively high pre-transplantation titers of anti-non-Gal IgG detectable by flow cytometry, whereas baboons 1 and 2 had undetectable titers. CONCLUSIONS: Engraftment and specific non-responsiveness to pig cells has been achieved in two of four baboons following GalT-KO pig-to-baboon BMT. Engraftment correlated with absence of preformed anti-non-Gal IgG serum antibodies. These results are encouraging with regard to the possibility of achieving transplantation tolerance across this xenogeneic barrier. (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic chimerism induces transplantation tolerance across allogeneic and xenogeneic barriers, but has been difficult to achieve in the pig-to-primate model. We have now utilized swine with knockout of the gene coding for alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (GalT-KO pigs) as bone marrow donors in an attempt to achieve chimerism and tolerance by avoiding the effects of natural antibodies to Gal determinants on pig hematopoietic cells. METHODS:Baboons (n = 4; Baboons 1 to 4 = B156, B158, B167, and B175, respectively) were splenectomized and conditioned with TBI (150 cGy), thymic irradiation (700 cGy), T cell depletion with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) and rat anti-primate CD2 (LoCD2b), and received FK506 and supportive therapy for 28 days. All animals received GalT-KO bone marrow (1 to 2 x 10(9) cells/kg) in two fractions on days 0 and 2, and were thereafter monitored for the presence of pig cells by flow cytometry, for porcine progenitor cells by PCR of BM colony-forming units, and for cellular reactivity to pig cells by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). In vitro antibody formation to LoCD2b and rATG was tested by ELISA; antibody reactivity to GalT-KO pig cells was tested by flow cytometry and cytotoxicity assays. Additionally, Baboons 3 and 4 received orthotopic kidney transplants on days 17 and 2, respectively, to test the potential impact of the protocol on renal transplantation. RESULTS: None of the animals showed detectable pig cells by flow cytometry for more than 12 h post-BM infusion. However, porcine progenitor cell engraftment, as evidenced by pig-derived colony forming units in the BM, as well as peripheral microchimerism in the thymus, lymph node, and peripheral blood was detected by PCR in baboons 1 and 2 for at least 28 days post-transplant. ELISA results confirmed humoral immunocompetence at time of transplantation as antibody titers to rat (LoCD2b) and rabbit (ATG) increased within 2 weeks. However, no induced antibodies to GalT-KO pig cells or increased donor specific cytotoxicity was detectable by flow cytometry. In contrast, baboons 3 and 4 developed serum antibodies to pig cells as well as to rat and rabbit immunoglobulin by day 14. Retrospective analysis revealed that although all four baboons possessed low levels of antibody-mediated cytotoxicity to GalT-KO cells prior to transplantation, the two baboons (3 and 4) that became sensitized to pig cells (and rejected pig kidneys) had relatively high pre-transplantation titers of anti-non-Gal IgG detectable by flow cytometry, whereas baboons 1 and 2 had undetectable titers. CONCLUSIONS: Engraftment and specific non-responsiveness to pig cells has been achieved in two of four baboons following GalT-KO pig-to-baboon BMT. Engraftment correlated with absence of preformed anti-non-Gal IgG serum antibodies. These results are encouraging with regard to the possibility of achieving transplantation tolerance across this xenogeneic barrier. (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Authors: B M Horner; R A Cina; K J Wikiel; B Lima; A Ghazi; D P Lo; K Yamada; D H Sachs; C A Huang Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Liangxue Lai; Donna Kolber-Simonds; Kwang-Wook Park; Hee-Tae Cheong; Julia L Greenstein; Gi-Sun Im; Melissa Samuel; Aaron Bonk; August Rieke; Billy N Day; Clifton N Murphy; David B Carter; Robert J Hawley; Randall S Prather Journal: Science Date: 2002-01-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tatsuo Kawai; A Benedict Cosimi; Thomas R Spitzer; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Susan L Saidman; Juanita Shaffer; Frederic I Preffer; Ruchuang Ding; Vijay Sharma; Jay A Fishman; Bimalangshu Dey; Dicken S C Ko; Martin Hertl; Nelson B Goes; Waichi Wong; Winfred W Williams; Robert B Colvin; Megan Sykes; David H Sachs Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sulemon Chaudhry; Yojiro Kato; Joshua Weiner; Paula Alonso-Guallart; Sam Baker; David C Woodland; Jay H Lefkowitch; Raimon Duran-Struuck; Hugo P Sondermeijer; Jonah Zitsman; Mallory L Sears; Anette Wu; Brian Karolewski; Philipp J Houck; Mercedes Martinez; Tomoaki Kato; Megan Sykes; Adam D Griesemer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Isaac Wamala; Abraham J Matar; Evan Farkash; Zhirui Wang; Christene A Huang; David H Sachs Journal: Transpl Immunol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 1.708
Authors: Fan Liang; Isaac Wamala; Joseph Scalea; Aseda Tena; Taylor Cormack; Shannon Pratts; Raimon Duran-Struuck; Nahel Elias; Martin Hertl; Christene A Huang; David H Sachs Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Hironosuke Watanabe; Yuichi Ariyoshi; Thomas Pomposelli; Kazuhiro Takeuchi; Dilrukshi K Ekanayake-Alper; Lennan K Boyd; Scott J Arn; Hisashi Sahara; Akira Shimizu; David Ayares; Marc I Lorber; Megan Sykes; David H Sachs; Kazuhiko Yamada Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 3.907