Literature DB >> 12777192

Sensitivity and specificity of a stool DNA multitarget assay panel for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Kuldeep S Tagore1, Michael J Lawson, Joy A Yucaitis, Rhonda Gage, Tashia Orr, Anthony P Shuber, Michael E Ross.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death. New noninvasive options for screening capable of diagnosing cancer at an early stage are needed to improve compliance and reduce mortality. This study was designed to provide an estimate of the sensitivity and specificity of a multitarget assay panel (MTAP) of stool DNA changes. Eighty patients with advanced colorectal neoplasia and 212 control subjects provided stool samples before colonoscopy. Patients with hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes were excluded. The MTAP included 21 specific mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), p53, and K-ras genes, a microsatellite instability marker (BAT-26), and a marker of abnormal apoptosis (DNA Integrity Assay). All samples were analyzed in the clinical laboratory at EXACT Sciences. Multitarget assay panel detected 33 of 52 patients (63.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.0%-76.4%) with invasive colorectal cancer, including 26 of 36 (72.2%) with node-negative disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage I/II) and 7 of 16 (43.7%) with advanced disease (AJCC stage III/IV). Sixteen of 28 patients (57.1%; 95% CI, 37.2%-75.5%) with advanced adenomas (lesions containing high-grade dysplasia, villous adenomas, or tubular adenomas > 1 cm in size) were detected, including 6 of 7 (85.7%) with high-grade dysplasia and 10 of 21 (47.6%) with other advanced adenomas. Specificity was 96.2% (95% CI, 92.7%-98.4%) in patients with either no colorectal lesions or diminutive polyps. Multitarget assay panel has better sensitivity than that reported with use of Hemoccult(R) II in fecal occult blood testing, with similar specificity. Sensitivity appeared to be equally high for patients with node-negative and advanced disease, as well as for advanced adenomas. This study contained a disproportionately high number of distal cancers and, as such, may not be representative of results in proximal lesions. Although a prospective study in an average-risk population is needed to validate these findings, MTAP may offer an important noninvasive option for population-based screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12777192     DOI: 10.3816/CCC.2003.n.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  38 in total

1.  Detection of K-ras gene mutation in fecal samples from elderly large intestinal cancer patients and its diagnostic significance.

Authors:  Jun Wan; Zi-Qi Zhang; Wei-Di You; Hua-Kui Sun; Jian-Ping Zhang; Ya-Hong Wang; Yong-He Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Screening options and recommendations for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M Geiger; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

4.  Is stool DNA multitarget testing an unreliable strategy for colorectal cancer screening?

Authors:  G Ferretti; E Bria; P Carlini; A Felici; D Giannarelli; F Cuppone; P Papaldo; C Nisticò; A Fabi; A Gelibter; E Terzoli; F Cognetti
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Screening tests for colorectal cancer: a menu of options remains relevant.

Authors:  James E Allison; Michael Lawson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  The transcriptional repressor SNAIL is overexpressed in human colon cancer.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Thomas C Smyrk; Jennifer Koetsier; Thomas A Victor; Ramesh K Wali
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  MethyLight droplet digital PCR for detection and absolute quantification of infrequently methylated alleles.

Authors:  Ming Yu; Kelly T Carter; Karen W Makar; Kathy Vickers; Cornelia M Ulrich; Robert E Schoen; Dean Brenner; Sanford D Markowitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Public health and cooperative group partnership: a colorectal cancer intervention.

Authors:  Sherri G Homan; Bob R Steward; Jane M Armer
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 9.  Cancer in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Jianlin Xie; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Circulating and stool nucleic acid analysis for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Giulia De Maio; Claudia Rengucci; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.