Literature DB >> 12777032

Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Robert Montés-Micó1, Enrique España, Jose L Menezo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast sensitivity under mesopic conditions in patients who have undergone uncomplicated bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.
METHODS: Best-corrected monocular contrast sensitivity was measured with the Stereo Optical F.A.C.T. chart at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 c/deg in 20 patients (20 left eyes) before and after bilateral LASIK (with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser and the Automated Corneal Shaper). Mean preoperative refractive error was -6.40 +/- 1.28 D (range -4.00 to -8.00 D) and postoperative mean refractive error was -0.41 +/- 0.45 D (range -0.75 to +0.50 D). Contrast sensitivity function was measured before and 6 months after surgery using four different chart luminances: 85, 5, 2.5, and 0.1 cd/m2, the first being a photopic level and the rest mesopic. Log contrast sensitivity values at each spatial frequency were used for statistical analysis and normalized values for graphical representation.
RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity of postoperative LASIK eyes did not differ from preoperative values at a photopic level (85 cd/m2). However, under mesopic conditions (5 cd/m2 or less) a statistically significant reduction (P<.01) in contrast sensitivity was found at high spatial frequencies (12 and 18 c/deg), although no significant contrast sensitivity differences were observed at low and middle spatial frequencies (P>.01 for 1.5, 3 and 6 c/deg).
CONCLUSIONS: LASIK induced significant reductions in contrast sensitivity under mesopic conditions only at high spatial frequencies, even though the photopic contrast sensitivity function was normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12777032     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20030501-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: results at 1 year.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Rui Li; Lei Tian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Evaluation of visual evoked potential binocular summation after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Rasoul Amini Vishteh; Ali Mirzajani; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Abolghasem Taghieh
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Relationship between corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ueda; Yoshiaki Nawa; Kozo Masuda; Hidetoshi Ishibashi; Yoshiaki Hara; Hiroshi Uozato
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.211

4.  Contrast sensitivity after zyoptix tissue saving LASIK and standard LASIK for myopia with 6-month followup.

Authors:  Li-Quan Zhao; Huang Zhu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Study of change in contrast sensitivity in relation to depth of ablation after wavefront optimized myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Mallikarjun M Heralgi; V Kavitha; Manisha Dwivedi; V Preethi; B V Roopasree; J Rajashekar; Ankit Deokar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  The effect of diffuse lamellar keratitis on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following LASIK.

Authors:  Eui Seok Han; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03

Review 7.  Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.