OBJECTIVE: The in vivo effects of anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) and anti-interleukin-6-alpha receptor (anti-IL-6R) monoclonal antibodies on immune response and survival rate of a burn with subsequent infection were assessed. SUBJECTS: Ten-week-old C 57 BL/6J mice received a standardized contact burn; 48 hrs later endotoxin (LPS) was injected intraperitoneally to induce systemic inflammation. Ten different groups were studied. Groups I-IV sustained a burn and/or a LPS-stimulus but did not receive any anti-cytokines and served as controls. Treatment groups V-X sustained the same injuries but also received anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R intravenously either before or after the LPS stimulus. In a further part of the study, a lethal dose of LPS was injected (LPS-LD(100) group) followed by an injection of anti-IL-6 antibody and/or anti-IL-6R antibody. MEASUREMENTS: Serum concentrations of IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and white blood cell and platelet counts were determined, and the survival rate over a 2-wk period was assessed. RESULTS: Treatment with anti-IL-6 slightly decreased the inflammatory response when it was given before or after LPS application. The inflammatory response was not decreased after treatment with anti-IL-6R. In the groups that received a combination of anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R, there was a significant reduction of the inflammatory response. This was more pronounced when the anti-cytokines were applied after LPS application. A significant reduction in mortality could be shown with both antibodies in the treatment groups and the groups that had received a lethal dose of LPS (LPS-LD(100) group). CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 has a low inflammatory potential, and IL-6R has no inflammatory potential by itself. In contrast, the IL-6/IL-6R complexes have a higher inflammatory potential. Mortality could be reduced by each antibody alone as well as by the combination, supporting the hypothesis that the inflammatory and lethal potentials of IL-6 are not identical. The study suggests that the use of antibodies against IL-6 or IL-6R is effective in the prevention of systemic inflammation in a murine burn model.
OBJECTIVE: The in vivo effects of anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) and anti-interleukin-6-alpha receptor (anti-IL-6R) monoclonal antibodies on immune response and survival rate of a burn with subsequent infection were assessed. SUBJECTS: Ten-week-old C 57 BL/6J mice received a standardized contact burn; 48 hrs later endotoxin (LPS) was injected intraperitoneally to induce systemic inflammation. Ten different groups were studied. Groups I-IV sustained a burn and/or a LPS-stimulus but did not receive any anti-cytokines and served as controls. Treatment groups V-X sustained the same injuries but also received anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R intravenously either before or after the LPS stimulus. In a further part of the study, a lethal dose of LPS was injected (LPS-LD(100) group) followed by an injection of anti-IL-6 antibody and/or anti-IL-6R antibody. MEASUREMENTS: Serum concentrations of IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and white blood cell and platelet counts were determined, and the survival rate over a 2-wk period was assessed. RESULTS: Treatment with anti-IL-6 slightly decreased the inflammatory response when it was given before or after LPS application. The inflammatory response was not decreased after treatment with anti-IL-6R. In the groups that received a combination of anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R, there was a significant reduction of the inflammatory response. This was more pronounced when the anti-cytokines were applied after LPS application. A significant reduction in mortality could be shown with both antibodies in the treatment groups and the groups that had received a lethal dose of LPS (LPS-LD(100) group). CONCLUSIONS:IL-6 has a low inflammatory potential, and IL-6R has no inflammatory potential by itself. In contrast, the IL-6/IL-6R complexes have a higher inflammatory potential. Mortality could be reduced by each antibody alone as well as by the combination, supporting the hypothesis that the inflammatory and lethal potentials of IL-6 are not identical. The study suggests that the use of antibodies against IL-6 or IL-6R is effective in the prevention of systemic inflammation in a murine burn model.
Authors: Markus F Neurath; Imke Atreya; Stefanie Zenker; Julia Panteleev-Ivlev; Stefan Wirtz; Tadamitsu Kishimoto; Maximilian J Waldner; Olga Ksionda; Victor L J Tybulewicz Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Rana Al-Sadi; Dongmei Ye; Michel Boivin; Shuhong Guo; Mariam Hashimi; Lisa Ereifej; Thomas Y Ma Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sara Nullens; Michael Staessens; Cédric Peleman; Philip Plaeke; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Sven Francque; Joris G De Man; Benedicte Y De Winter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240