Literature DB >> 12766651

Relationships between measurement of pain using visual analog score and morphine requirements during postoperative intravenous morphine titration.

Frédéric Aubrun1, Olivier Langeron, Christophe Quesnel, Pierre Coriat, Bruno Riou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous morphine titration is widely used to obtain rapid and complete postoperative pain relief, the relationship between measurement of pain and morphine requirements varies, and the evolution of pain during titration is poorly understood.
METHODS: Intravenous morphine titration was administered as a bolus of 2 (body weight < or = 60 kg) or 3 mg (body weight > 60 kg) during the immediate postoperative period in the PACU. The interval between each bolus was 5 min. The visual analog scale (VAS) score threshold required to administer morphine was 30, and pain relief was defined as a VAS score of 30 or less.
RESULTS: Data from 3,045 patients were analyzed. The mean initial VAS score was 73 +/- 19 (mean +/- SD), and the mean morphine dose required to obtain pain relief was 0.17 +/- 0.10 mg/kg, i.e., a median of four boluses (range, 1-20). When patients were grouped according to several classes of initial VAS score (31-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, 90-100), it seemed that the relationship between VAS score and morphine requirements was a sigmoid curve. A VAS score of 70 or greater predicted the need for a high (>0.15 mg/kg) morphine dose (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.54). During the pain relief process, the relationship between VAS score and time was depicted by a sigmoid curve.
CONCLUSION: A VAS score of 70 or greater should be considered indicative of severe pain. The relationship between the initial VAS score and morphine requirements is not linear, and the evolution of the VAS score during the pain relief process is described by a sigmoid curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12766651     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  34 in total

Review 1.  [Non-opioid analgesics for perioperative pain therapy. Risks and rational basis for use].

Authors:  A Brack; H L Rittner; M Schäfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Slow injection of nefopam reduces pain intensity associated with intravenous injection: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Byung Gun Lim; Heezoo Kim; Myoung Hoon Kong; Mi Kyoung Lee; Il Ok Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Guarding pain and spontaneous activity of nociceptors after skin versus skin plus deep tissue incision.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Biological pathways and genetic variables involved in pain.

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Charles S Cleeland; Pål Klepstad; Christine Miaskowski; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Polly E Bijur; Angela M Mills; Andrew K Chang; Deborah White; Andrew Restivo; Shaun Persaud; Clyde B Schechter; E John Gallagher; Adrienne J Birnbaum
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Impact of Perioperative Epidural Placement on Postdischarge Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Karim S Ladha; Elisabetta Patorno; Jun Liu; Brian T Bateman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 7.  Progress in genetic studies of pain and analgesia.

Authors:  Michael L Lacroix-Fralish; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.820

8.  Randomized clinical trial of an intravenous hydromorphone titration protocol versus usual care for management of acute pain in older emergency department patients.

Authors:  Andrew K Chang; Polly E Bijur; Michelle Davitt; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Genetic contributions to pain: a review of findings in humans.

Authors:  R B Fillingim; M R Wallace; D M Herbstman; M Ribeiro-Dasilva; R Staud
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.511

10.  Drainage Collection After Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Cold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space.

Authors:  Zifei Li; Dali Mu; Boyang Xu; Chenglong Wang; Hao Cheng; Shangshan Li; Jun Qi
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.