Literature DB >> 24201414

Slow injection of nefopam reduces pain intensity associated with intravenous injection: a prospective randomized trial.

Young Min Kim1, Byung Gun Lim, Heezoo Kim, Myoung Hoon Kong, Mi Kyoung Lee, Il Ok Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the frequency and severity of pain associated with intravenous injection of nefopam and to determine whether a slow rate of administration can effectively reduce such pain.
METHODS: We used a solution containing 30 mg nefopam diluted to 20 ml in saline. In all, 102 adult patients undergoing minor surgery were randomly allocated to one of three administration groups: A (60 ml/h, n = 34); B (120 ml/h, n = 34); or C (180 ml/h, n = 34). All patients scored the maximal pain experienced during the 120-s infusion period, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the verbal pain score (VPS). Adverse events including phlebitis were recorded.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (29 in group A, 27 each in groups B and C) were included in the final analysis. The incidence of injection pain was lower in group A (86.2 %) than in groups B (96.3 %) and C (100 %), but this difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of patients with a tolerable level of pain (VAS 0-3 and VPS 0-1) was significantly higher in group A (79.3 %) versus groups B (7.4 %) and C (3.7 %). The mean VAS scores for groups A, B, and C were 2.2 ± 1.3, 5.1 ± 1.6, and 7.2 ± 1.7, respectively, and these differences were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: At the slower rate of infusion (60 ml/h) of the 1.5 mg/ml nefopam solution, injection pain intensity was attenuated to a significantly greater degree than at the faster rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24201414     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-013-1744-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  34 in total

1.  Incidence of propofol injection pain and effect of lidocaine pretreatment during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Ji Suk Kwon; Eun Soo Kim; Kwang Bum Cho; Kyung Sik Park; Woo Young Park; Jeong Eun Lee; Tae Yol Kim; Byoung Kuk Jang; Woo Jin Chung; Jae Seok Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Rapid injection reduces pain on injection with propofol.

Authors:  T Shimizu; S Inomata; S Kihara; H Toyooka; J R Brimacombe
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Respiratory and metabolic effects of oral nefopam in human volunteers.

Authors:  A M Bhatt; B J Pleuvry; S E Maddison
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Local warming at injection site helps alleviate pain after rocuronium administration.

Authors:  Charu Mahajan; Girija Prasad Rath; Parmod Kumar Bithal; Hemanshu Prabhakar; Rahul Yadav; Surya Kumar Dube
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Midazolam does not influence intravenous fentanyl-induced analgesia in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J P Zacny; D W Coalson; J M Klafta; P A Klock; R Alessi; G Rupani; C J Young; P G Patil; J L Apfelbaum
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Propofol: clinical strategies for preventing the pain of injection.

Authors:  R P Scott; D A Saunders; J Norman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Relationships between measurement of pain using visual analog score and morphine requirements during postoperative intravenous morphine titration.

Authors:  Frédéric Aubrun; Olivier Langeron; Christophe Quesnel; Pierre Coriat; Bruno Riou
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  The median effective dose of nefopam and morphine administered intravenously for postoperative pain after minor surgery: a prospective randomized double-blinded isobolographic study of their analgesic action.

Authors:  Hélène Beloeil; Noémie Delage; Isabelle Nègre; Jean-Xavier Mazoit; Dan Benhamou
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Spinal and Supraspinal sites for morphine and nefopam analgesia in the mouse.

Authors:  M F Piercey; L A Schroeder
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-09-11       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Nefopam and ketamine comparably enhance postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Barbara Kapfer; Pascal Alfonsi; Bruno Guignard; Daniel I Sessler; Marcel Chauvin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nefopam for the prevention of perioperative shivering: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Meng Lv; Xuetao Wang; Wendong Qu; Mengjie Liu; Yuelan Wang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  The analgesic effect of nefopam combined with low dose remifentanil in patients undergoing middle ear surgery under desflurane anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jung Young Yoo; Byung Gun Lim; Heezoo Kim; Myoung-Hoon Kong; Il-Ok Lee; Nan Sook Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-01-28

3.  Effects of warmed carrier fluid on nefopam injection-induced pain.

Authors:  Hyung Rae Cho; Seon Hwan Kim; Jin A Kim; Jin Hye Min; Yong Kyung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2018-04-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.