Literature DB >> 23846749

Randomized clinical trial of an intravenous hydromorphone titration protocol versus usual care for management of acute pain in older emergency department patients.

Andrew K Chang1, Polly E Bijur, Michelle Davitt, E John Gallagher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Opioid titration is an effective strategy for treating pain; however, titration is generally impractical in the busy emergency department (ED) setting. Our objective was to test a rapid, two-step, hydromorphone titration protocol against usual care in older patients presenting to the ED with acute severe pain.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients 65 years of age and older presenting to an adult, urban, academic ED with acute severe pain. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01429285). Patients randomized to the hydromorphone titration protocol initially received 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients randomized to usual care received any dose of any intravenous opioid. At 15 min, patients in both groups were asked, 'Do you want more pain medication?' Patients in the hydromorphone titration group who answered 'yes' received a second dose of 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients in the usual care group who answered 'yes' had their ED attending physician notified, who then could administer any (or no) additional medication. The primary efficacy outcome was satisfactory analgesia defined a priori as the patient declining additional analgesia at least once when asked at 15 or 60 min after administration of the initial opioid. Dose was calculated in morphine equivalent units (MEU: 1 mg hydromorphone = 7 mg morphine). The need for naloxone to reverse adverse opioid effects was the primary safety outcome.
RESULTS: 83.0 % of 153 patients in the hydromorphone titration group achieved satisfactory analgesia compared with 82.5 % of 166 patients in the usual care group (p = 0.91). Patients in the hydromorphone titration group received lower mean initial doses of opioids at baseline than patients in the usual care group (3.5 MEU vs. 4.7 MEU, respectively; p ≤ 0.001) and lower total opioids through 60 min (5.3 MEU vs. 6.0 MEU; p = 0.03). No patient needed naloxone.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose titration of intravenous hydromorphone in increments of 0.5 mg provides comparable analgesia to usual care with less opioid over 60 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23846749      PMCID: PMC3758665          DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0103-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  25 in total

1.  Introduction. Pain and the elderly.

Authors:  Bill H McCarberg
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  A randomized, double-blind study comparing morphine with fentanyl in prehospital analgesia.

Authors:  Michel Galinski; François Dolveck; Stephen W Borron; Loic Tual; Vincent Van Laer; Jean-Yves Lardeur; Frédéric Lapostolle; Frédéric Adnet
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 3.  Pharmacologic issues in geriatric emergency medicine.

Authors:  Michelle P Blanda
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Age as a risk factor for inadequate emergency department analgesia.

Authors:  J S Jones; K Johnson; M McNinch
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Intravenous morphine at 0.1 mg/kg is not effective for controlling severe acute pain in the majority of patients.

Authors:  Polly E Bijur; Mark K Kenny; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Safety and efficacy of hydromorphone as an analgesic alternative to morphine in acute pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrew K Chang; Polly E Bijur; Robert H Meyer; Mark K Kenny; Clemencia Solorzano; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Ethnicity as a risk factor for inadequate emergency department analgesia.

Authors:  K H Todd; N Samaroo; J R Hoffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Mar 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Aging, the gastrointestinal tract, and risk of acid-related disease.

Authors:  David A Greenwald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-09-06       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Pain management in the elderly.

Authors:  Thomas A Cavalieri
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2002-09

10.  The effect of ethnicity on physician estimates of pain severity in patients with isolated extremity trauma.

Authors:  K H Todd; T Lee; J R Hoffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Mar 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Intravenous morphine titration vs. oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen for adults with lower extremity displaced fracture in an emergency department setting: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhengqi Pan; Yongjian Qi; Yinxian Wen; Liaobin Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Older adults and high-risk medication administration in the emergency department.

Authors:  Mitchell Kim; Steven H Mitchell; Medley Gatewood; Katherine A Bennett; Paul R Sutton; Carol A Crawford; Itay Bentov; Mamatha Damodarasamy; Stephen J Kaplan; May J Reed
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2017-11-08

3.  Patient-controlled intravenous tramadol versus patient-controlled intravenous hydromorphone for analgesia after secondary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to compare analgesic, anti-anxiety and anti-depression effects.

Authors:  Guangyou Duan; Xiaohang Bao; Guiying Yang; Jing Peng; Zhuoxi Wu; Peng Zhao; Zhiyi Zuo; Hong Li
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.133

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.