Literature DB >> 6094438

Cefotaxime therapy of bacterial meningitis in children.

T G Wells, J M Trang, A L Brown, B C Marmer, R F Jacobs.   

Abstract

Thirty children with bacterial meningitis were randomized to receive either ampicillin and chloramphenicol in standard doses or cefotaxime (50 mg/kg/dose every 6 h) for 10 to 14 days. Eighteen patients received ampicillin and chloramphenicol and 12 patients received cefotaxime. Cerebrospinal fluid isolated included: Haemophilus influenzae (20), Streptococcus pneumoniae (4), Neisseria meningitidis (3), Group B streptococcus (2), and Salmonella enteritidis (1). Five of the H. influenzae isolates were ampicillin resistant but no isolates were resistant to cefotaxime. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefotaxime for 30 isolates ranged from 0.0004 to 0.06 mg/l, while the minimum bactericidal concentrations ranged from 0.007 to 0.12 mg/l. The cerebrospinal fluid bactericidal titres for the cefotaxime-treated group ranged from 1:64 to 1:1024. On the second day of therapy the mean cefotaxime serum concentrations were 56.9 +/- 28.7 mg/l at 1 h and 3.66 +/- 5.65 mg/l at 6 h after administration of the drug whilst mean desacetyl-cefotaxime serum concentrations were 12.31 +/- 7.56 mg/l at one hour and 7.96 +/- 8.26 mg/l at 6 h respectively. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime measured one hour after drug administration were 3.72 +/- 5.57 mg/l and 4.35 +/- 7.12 mg/l, respectively. No adverse drug reactions were noted in either treatment group. Cefotaxime proved to be both as safe and as efficacious as standard therapy for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6094438     DOI: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  14 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data collection in children and neonates. A quiet frontier.

Authors:  J T Gilman; P Gal
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  K Prasad; A Kumar; P K Gupta; T Singhal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

3.  In vitro antibiotic sensitivity pattern of common bacterial isolates from cases of acute bacterial meningitis with special reference to ceftriaxone.

Authors:  B N Rao; I M Kashbur; N M Shembesh; S M el Bargathy
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Third generation cephalosporins in the parenteral to oral switch.

Authors:  D Rimmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Cephalosporins in the treatment of meningitis.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Amanda K Sullins; Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime pharmacokinetics in infants and children with meningitis.

Authors:  J M Trang; R F Jacobs; G L Kearns; A L Brown; T G Wells; F L Underwood; R B Kluza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?

Authors:  T Duke; A Michael; D Mokela; T Wal; J Reeder
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Bacterial meningitis: is there a "best" antimicrobial therapy?

Authors:  H F Eichenwald
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.