Literature DB >> 3847486

A prospective randomized comparison of cefotaxime vs ampicillin and chloramphenicol for bacterial meningitis in children.

R F Jacobs, T G Wells, R W Steele, T Yamauchi.   

Abstract

Fifty children with bacterial meningitis were prospectively randomized to receive cefotaxime (50 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours) or ampicillin and chloramphenicol in standard doses. Twenty-three patients received cefotaxime and 27 received standard therapy. Bacterial isolates included: Haemophilus influenzae (29), Streptococcus pneumoniae (eight), Neisseria meningitidis (eight), group B streptococci (three), and Salmonella enteritidis (two). Ten (34%) of the H. influenzae isolates were resistant to ampicillin, nine on the basis of beta-lactamase production. All strains were susceptible to cefotaxime. Clinical cure rates for the cefotaxime (100%) and standard therapy (96%) groups were similar; survival without detectable sequelae was similar, at 78% and 77%, respectively. The duration of therapy, 11.1 +/- 2.4 days (range 10 to 21 days) vs 11.9 +/- 3.9 days (range 10 to 21 days), and days to defervescence, 4.7 +/- 2.6 days (range 1 to 14 days) vs 5.6 +/- 2.9 days (range 2 to 17 days), were similar in the cefotaxime and standard therapy groups, respectively. No adverse drug reactions or side effects were noted in either group. Cefotaxime was found to be as safe and effective as standard therapy for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3847486     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80634-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  18 in total

1.  Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.

Authors:  D Kalman; S L Barriere
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Antibiotic choices for meningitis beyond the neonatal period.

Authors:  N J Klein; R S Heyderman; M Levin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  K Prasad; A Kumar; P K Gupta; T Singhal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

4.  Bacterial meningitis in India: an IJP survey.

Authors:  S K Kabra; P Kumar; I C Verma; D Mukherjee; B H Chowdhary; S Sengupta; R N Singh; S P Khatua; N Miglani; K M Sehai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Amoxicillin treatment of experimental acute otitis media caused by Haemophilus influenzae with non-beta-lactamase-mediated resistance to beta-lactams: aspects of virulence and treatment.

Authors:  A Melhus; H Janson; E Westman; A Hermansson; A Forsgren; K Prellner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cefotaxime versus chloramphenicol for ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. A retrospective study of 62 cases.

Authors:  J R Lapointe; L Chicoine
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Disk diffusion interpretive criteria for extended-spectrum cephalosporins with Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; L A Maher; J S Redding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Failure to detect ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae by standard disk susceptibility testing.

Authors:  P M Mendelman; D O Chaffin; C Clausen; T L Stull; C Needham; J D Williams; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: mechanisms, clinical importance and consequences for therapy.

Authors:  R de Groot; G Dzoljic-Danilovic; B van Klingeren; W H Goessens; H J Neyens
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of cefotaxime in the management of pediatric infections.

Authors:  R F Jacobs
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.