Literature DB >> 12765401

Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: a preliminary report.

Rochelle S Newman1.   

Abstract

This paper examines whether correlations between speech perception and speech production exist, and, if so, whether they might provide a way of evaluating different acoustic metrics. The cues listeners use for many phonemic distinctions are not known, often because many different acoustic cues are highly correlated with one another, making it difficult to distinguish among them. Perception-production correlations may provide a new means of doing so. In the present paper, correlations were examined between acoustic measures taken on listeners' perceptual prototypes for a given speech category and on their average production of members of that category. Significant correlations were found for VOT among stop consonants, and for spectral peaks (but not centroids or skewness) for voiceless fricatives. These results suggest that correlations between speech perception and production may provide a methodology for evaluating different proposed acoustic metrics.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12765401     DOI: 10.1121/1.1567280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Fabienne Samson; Lucie Ménard; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production.

Authors:  Joanne Jingwen Li; Samantha Ayala; Daphna Harel; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An investigation of the relation between sibilant production and somatosensory and auditory acuity.

Authors:  Satrajit S Ghosh; Melanie L Matthies; Edwin Maas; Alexandra Hanson; Mark Tiede; Lucie Ménard; Frank H Guenther; Harlan Lane; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09-01

7.  Toward improved spectral measures of /s/: results from adolescents.

Authors:  Laura L Koenig; Christine H Shadle; Jonathan L Preston; Christine R Mooshammer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Mark Tiede
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Linking Variation in Perception and Production in Sound Change: Evidence from Dutch Obstruent Devoicing.

Authors:  Anne-France Pinget; René Kager; Hans Van de Velde
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.