Literature DB >> 12761388

Reducing the computational complexity of protein folding via fragment folding and assembly.

Nurit Haspel1, Chung-Jung Tsai, Haim Wolfson, Ruth Nussinov.   

Abstract

Understanding, and ultimately predicting, how a 1-D protein chain reaches its native 3-D fold has been one of the most challenging problems during the last few decades. Data increasingly indicate that protein folding is a hierarchical process. Hence, the question arises as to whether we can use the hierarchical concept to reduce the practically intractable computational times. For such a scheme to work, the first step is to cut the protein sequence into fragments that form local minima on the polypeptide chain. The conformations of such fragments in solution are likely to be similar to those when the fragments are embedded in the native fold, although alternate conformations may be favored during the mutual stabilization in the combinatorial assembly process. Two elements are needed for such cutting: (1) a library of (clustered) fragments derived from known protein structures and (2) an assignment algorithm that selects optimal combinations to "cover" the protein sequence. The next two steps in hierarchical folding schemes, not addressed here, are the combinatorial assembly of the fragments and finally, optimization of the obtained conformations. Here, we address the first step in a hierarchical protein-folding scheme. The input is a target protein sequence and a library of fragments created by clustering building blocks that were generated by cutting all protein structures. The output is a set of cutout fragments. We briefly outline a graph theoretic algorithm that automatically assigns building blocks to the target sequence, and we describe a sample of the results we have obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12761388      PMCID: PMC2323902          DOI: 10.1110/ps.0232903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  41 in total

Review 1.  Autonomous protein folding units.

Authors:  Z Y Peng; L C Wu
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding.

Authors:  R L Baldwin; G D Rose
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Binding and folding: in search of intramolecular chaperone-like building block fragments.

Authors:  B Ma; C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2000-09

4.  HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins.

Authors:  C Bystroff; V Thorsson; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs.

Authors:  C Bystroff; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-08-21       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The foldon universe: a survey of structural similarity and self-recognition of independently folding units.

Authors:  A R Panchenko; Z Luthey-Schulten; R Cole; P G Wolynes
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-09-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Probing the partly folded states of proteins by limited proteolysis.

Authors:  A Fontana; P Polverino de Laureto; V De Filippis; E Scaramella; M Zambonin
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1997

8.  An automated classification of the structure of protein loops.

Authors:  B Oliva; P A Bates; E Querol; F X Avilés; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-03-07       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Calcium binding peptides from alpha-lactalbumin: implications for protein folding and stability.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; J A Boice; W J Wu; R Fairman; D P Raleigh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Do aligned sequences share the same fold?

Authors:  R A Abagyan; S Batalov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  15 in total

1.  In silico protein design by combinatorial assembly of protein building blocks.

Authors:  Hui-Hsu Gavin Tsai; Chung-Jung Tsai; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Analysis of core-periphery organization in protein contact networks reveals groups of structurally and functionally critical residues.

Authors:  Arnold Emerson Isaac; Sitabhra Sinha
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Probing protein fold space with a simplified model.

Authors:  Peter Minary; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Elucidating quantitative stability/flexibility relationships within thioredoxin and its fragments using a distance constraint model.

Authors:  Donald J Jacobs; Dennis R Livesay; Jeremy Hules; Maria Luisa Tasayco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  The protein folding problem.

Authors:  Ken A Dill; S Banu Ozkan; M Scott Shell; Thomas R Weikl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 6.  The loop hypothesis: contribution of early formed specific non-local interactions to the determination of protein folding pathways.

Authors:  Tomer Orevi; Gil Rahamim; Gershon Hazan; Dan Amir; Elisha Haas
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-04-12

7.  Constructing templates for protein structure prediction by simulation of protein folding pathways.

Authors:  Ilona Kifer; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-01

8.  A conditional random fields method for RNA sequence-structure relationship modeling and conformation sampling.

Authors:  Zhiyong Wang; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Designing succinct structural alphabets.

Authors:  Shuai Cheng Li; Dongbo Bu; Xin Gao; Jinbo Xu; Ming Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Protein fragments: functional and structural roles of their coevolution networks.

Authors:  Linda Dib; Alessandra Carbone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.