Literature DB >> 12759472

Benign and malignant lesions of the stomach: evaluation of CT criteria for differentiation.

Erik K Insko1, Marc S Levine, Bernard A Birnbaum, Jill E Jacobs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) criteria for differentiating benign from malignant stomach lesions in patients with a thickened gastric wall at CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A radiology department file search revealed 36 patients with a thickened gastric wall at CT who underwent double-contrast barium suspension upper gastrointestinal tract examinations within 6 weeks before or after CT. The authors reviewed the CT images without knowledge of the final radiologic, endoscopic, or pathologic findings to determine the degree of gastric wall thickening and the symmetry, distribution, and enhancement of the thickened wall. The sensitivity and specificity of these findings for detection of malignancy were calculated.
RESULTS: Two of 36 patients had two gastric abnormalities each. The final diagnoses in the 38 cases were gastritis in 19, hiatal hernia in four, benign ulcer in three, benign (n = 3) or malignant (n = 8) gastric neoplasm in 11, and no gastric abnormality in one case. Mean wall thickness was 1.5 cm (range, 0.7-7.5 cm). The finding of gastric wall thickness of 1 cm or greater had a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of only 42% for detection of malignant or potentially malignant stomach lesions. The finding of focal, eccentric, or enhancing wall thickening had a sensitivity of 93%, 71%, or 43%, respectively, and a specificity of 8%, 75%, or 88%, respectively, for detection of these lesions. Gastric wall thickening that was 1 cm or greater and was focal, eccentric, and enhancing had a specificity of 92% but a sensitivity of only 36% for detection of these lesions.
CONCLUSION: Gastric wall thickness of 1 cm or greater at CT had a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of less than 50% for detection of malignant or potentially malignant stomach lesions that necessitated further diagnostic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12759472     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2281020623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Potential role of Calogen as an oral contrast medium in the evaluation of the gastric wall at MRI.

Authors:  Derek G Lohan; Sinead M Walsh; Ruaridh H Allen; Carmel G Cronin; Conor P Meehan; Joseph M Murphy; Peter A McCarthy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of bowel wall thickening by computed tomography to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.

Authors:  Chaitanya Tapasvi; Neeraj Prajapati; Rajneesh Madhok; Ashish K Gupta; Vichi Taneja; Abhinav Aggarwal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 3.  Follow-up of gastric cancer: a review.

Authors:  John Whiting; Takeshi Sano; Makoto Saka; Takeo Fukagawa; Hitoshi Katai; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Development and validation of a dual-energy CT-based model to estimate the malignant probability of distal gastric wall thickening.

Authors:  Qiu-Xia Feng; Lu-Lu Xu; Qiong Li; Xiao-Ting Jiang; Bo Tang; Na-Na Sun; Xi-Sheng Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-04

5.  The Role of Conventional Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Antrum Wall Thickness in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Fatih Mehmet Yazar; Murat Baykara; Mustafa Karaağaç; Ertan Bülbüloğlu
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Sensitivity of ultrasonography for gastric cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  David Martinez-Ares; Pedro A Alonso Aguirre; Jesús Yáñez López; Ignacio Martín-Granizo Barrenechea; Jesús Martinez Cadilla; Dolores Rodriguez Martinez; Abel Pallarés Peral
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Neoplastic stomach lesions and their mimickers: spectrum of imaging manifestations.

Authors:  Vivek Virmani; Ashish Khandelwal; Vineeta Sethi; Margret Fraser-Hill; Najla Fasih; Ania Kielar
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Differentiating malignant from benign gastric mucosal lesions with quantitative analysis in dual energy spectral computed tomography: Initial experience.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Meng; Cheng Ni; Yaqi Shen; Xuemei Hu; Xiao Chen; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Multimodal Approach.

Authors:  Humair S Quadri; Brandon G Smaglo; Shannon J Morales; Anna Chloe Phillips; Aimee D Martin; Walid M Chalhoub; Nadim G Haddad; Keith R Unger; Angela D Levy; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-08-03

10.  FDG-avid antrum-pylorus ulcer, adjacent lymph node, and abdominal wall nodule mimicking gastric cancer with metastases.

Authors:  Dan Ruan; Yanhong Wang; Janyao Fang; Xinyu Teng; Beilei Li
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.