Literature DB >> 35557595

Development and validation of a dual-energy CT-based model to estimate the malignant probability of distal gastric wall thickening.

Qiu-Xia Feng1, Lu-Lu Xu1, Qiong Li1, Xiao-Ting Jiang1, Bo Tang1, Na-Na Sun1, Xi-Sheng Liu1.   

Abstract

Background: This study developed and validated a viable model for the preoperative diagnosis of malignant distal gastric wall thickening based on dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DEsCT).
Methods: The imaging data of 208 patients who were diagnosed with distal gastric wall thickening using DEsCT were retrospectively collected and divided into a training cohort (n=151) and a testing cohort (n=57). The patient's clinical data and pathological information were collated. The multivariable logistic regression model was built using 5 selected features, and subsequently, a 10-fold cross-validation was performed to identify the optimal model. A nomogram was established based on the training cohort. Finally, the diagnostic performance of the best model was compared to the existing conventional CT scheme through evaluating the discrimination ability in the testing cohort in terms of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration, and clinical usefulness.
Results: Stepwise regression analysis identified 5 candidate variables with the smallest Akaike information criteria (AIC), namely, the venous phase spectral curve [VP_ SC; odds ratio (OR) 8.419], focal enhancement (OR 3.741), arterial phase mixed (OR 1.030), tumor site (OR 0.573), and diphasic shape change (DP_shape change; OR 2.746). The best regression model with 10-fold cross-validation consisting of VP_SC and focal enhancement was built using the 5 candidate variables. The average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the model from the 10-fold cross-validation was 0.803 (sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity of 94.1%, and accuracy of 74.8%). In the testing cohort, the DEsCT model identified using the regression model performed better (AUC 0.905, sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 85.4%, and accuracy 84.2%) than did the conventional CT scheme (AUC 0.852, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 76.6%, and accuracy 77.2%). The nomogram based on the DEsCT model showed good calibration and provided a better net benefit for predicting malignancy of distal gastric wall thickening. Conclusions: Comprehensive assessment with the DEsCT-based model can be used to facilitate the individualized diagnosis of malignancy risk in patients presenting with distal gastric wall thickening. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric wall; dual-energy CT; gastric cancer (GC); spectral CT

Year:  2022        PMID: 35557595      PMCID: PMC9086059          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  27 in total

1.  Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Alvin C Silva; Brian G Morse; Amy K Hara; Robert G Paden; Norio Hongo; William Pavlicek
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  Vascular endothelial growth factor a inhibition in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Do Joong Park; Nicholas J Thomas; Changhwan Yoon; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Benign and malignant lesions of the stomach: evaluation of CT criteria for differentiation.

Authors:  Erik K Insko; Marc S Levine; Bernard A Birnbaum; Jill E Jacobs
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice.

Authors:  Wai K Leung; Ming-shiang Wu; Yasuo Kakugawa; Jae J Kim; Khay-guan Yeoh; Khean Lee Goh; Kai-chun Wu; Deng-chyang Wu; Jose Sollano; Udom Kachintorn; Takuji Gotoda; Jaw-town Lin; Wei-cheng You; Enders K W Ng; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic and radiographic screening.

Authors:  Chisato Hamashima; Michiko Shabana; Katsuo Okada; Mikizo Okamoto; Yoneatsu Osaki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 6.  Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment.

Authors:  Robert Sitarz; Małgorzata Skierucha; Jerzy Mielko; G Johan A Offerhaus; Ryszard Maciejewski; Wojciech P Polkowski
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  T and N Staging of Gastric Cancer Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Zhao-Yong Xie; Rui-Mei Chai; Guo-Cheng Ding; Yi Liu; Ke Ren
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The LOC-1 Study.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Naoki Hiki; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Takayuki Abe; Souya Nunobe; Mitsumi Terada; Atsushi Matsuki; Hideki Sunagawa; Masaki Aizawa; Mark A Healy; Manabu Iwasaki; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Common Locations of Gastric Cancer: Review of Research from the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Era.

Authors:  Su Jin Kim; Cheol Woong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Significance of Gastric Wall Thickening Detected in Abdominal CT Scan to Predict Gastric Malignancy.

Authors:  A Akbas; H Bakir; M F Dasiran; H Dagmura; Z Ozmen; N Yildiz Celtek; E Daldal; O Demir; A Kefeli; I Okan
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.