Literature DB >> 18758959

Sensitivity of ultrasonography for gastric cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients.

David Martinez-Ares1, Pedro A Alonso Aguirre, Jesús Yáñez López, Ignacio Martín-Granizo Barrenechea, Jesús Martinez Cadilla, Dolores Rodriguez Martinez, Abel Pallarés Peral.   

Abstract

Endoscopy with biopsy sampling is the gold standard used in gastric cancer diagnosis. However, the positive predictive value of signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of carcinomas is quite limited, and, therefore, many patients are subjected to non-diagnostic endoscopies, especially when symptoms are not so specific. This study shows that ultrasonography is sensitive enough for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, and, therefore, use of this technique would further ensure a better selection of patients for endoscopy. The study included 143 patients (86 men and 57 women, with an average age of 68.6 years) who were suspected of having gastric cancer. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography was evaluated in a blind study. The conventional technique was used in all cases. Demographic parameters and a series of other clinical-analytical variables were studied to look for possible gastric cancer predictive factors, which when present would make ultrasonographic results irrelevant. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 12.0, wherein a value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Of the 143 patients studied, 40 were diagnosed to have gastric cancer. Sonography was able to diagnose 37 cases correctly, while there were three false negative findings and eight false positive findings. This results in 92.5% sensitivity, 92.2% specificity, 82.2% positive predictive value, 96.9% negative predictive value, and a global accuracy of 92.3%. Univariate analysis showed that persistent vomiting (P = 0.021), hemoglobin level of less than 8 g/dl (P = 0.045) and a positive ultrasonography result (P < 0.0001) were associated with a higher frequency of gastric cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that persistent vomiting, with an odds ratio for gastric cancer of 3.68 (95% confidence interval 1.15-11.79; P = 0.039), and a positive ultrasonography result, with an odds ratio for gastric cancer of 117.78 (95% confidence interval 32.45-427.49; P < 0.0001), could be considered as independent predictive factors for gastric cancer. It was concluded that ultrasonography is a very sensitive and specific technique for diagnosing gastric cancer. Gastric cancer was found to be present in just 28% of the patients studied, and their condition was suspect because of the clinical manifestations. Only vomiting and a positive ultrasonography result can be considered as independent predictive factors of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18758959     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0474-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  45 in total

1.  Value of the unaided clinical diagnosis in dyspeptic patients in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Epidemiologic trends in esophageal and gastric cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Linda Morris Brown; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  Do young patients with dyspepsia need investigation?

Authors:  B Williams; M Luckas; J H Ellingham; A Dain; A C Wicks
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Does concern about missing malignancy justify endoscopy in uncomplicated dyspepsia in patients aged less than 55?

Authors:  D Gillen; K E McColl
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan.

Authors:  M Inoue; S Tsugane
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction and delayed MRI of gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  C K Wang; Y T Kuo; G C Liu; K B Tsai; Y S Huang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Survival after gastric adenocarcinoma resection: eighteen-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Steven C Cunningham; Farin Kamangar; Min P Kim; Sommer Hammoud; Raqeeb Haque; Anirban Maitra; Elizabeth Montgomery; Richard E Heitmiller; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  The epidemiology of gastric cancer.

Authors:  David M Roder
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 9.  [Exactness of transcutaneous sonography in the diagnosis of gastric wall lesions].

Authors:  Rocío Quiroz Moreno; Margarita Isabel Morales Guzmán; Juan A Cervantes Monroy; Guillermo Rueda Torre; Leticia Díaz Caldelas
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Mex       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep

10.  Management of dyspeptic patients in primary care. Value of the unaided clinical diagnosis and of dyspepsia subgrouping.

Authors:  J M Hansen; P Bytzer; O B Schaffalitzky De Muckadell
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Zini; B Cavallo Marincola; D Geiger; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.